All Pennsylvania projects
Contested

Conewago Township Data Center (Rexroth Farms)

Conewago Township, York County

Florida-based Elysian Partners and the Rexroth family farm business asked Conewago Township, York County, to allow a data center on 541 acres of farmland on Bowers Bridge Road, and the township has paused data center applications until January 3, 2027 while it drafts an ordinance that would steer data centers into an overlay that's mostly industrial land.

ContestedLargeTBD/UndisclosedGreenfieldS Central
At a glance

The project by the numbers

StatusProposed
Building area750,000 sq ft
Site541 acres
Permanent jobs, as claimed120
First announced2025-09-22
Target onlineTBD

Conewago Township has paused data center applications while it writes its own rules

The number that mattersThe township's September 22, 2026 draft would require at least 100 contiguous acres, 1,000-foot yards wherever a data center lot abuts homes or residential zoning, and a nighttime noise cap of 40 dBA at homes.
Developer
Elysian Partners, LLC, a privately held real estate company from Boca Raton, Florida, represented by Kevin Brown, working with the landowner, Rexroth Limited Partnership (Rexroth Farms). Attorney Stacey MacNeal spoke for Rexroth Properties at the September 22, 2025 planning commission meeting. Neither has filed a data center application, according to the township manager.
Tenant
No end user has been named. Elysian described a generic facility of about 750,000 square feet with about 120 employees over three shifts, and township records don't identify a tenant.
Current stage
No application is on file, and Resolution 2026-13 pauses data center applications until January 3, 2027 while the township finishes its own data center ordinance and overlay map. The planning commission reviewed the September 22, 2026 draft on September 28, and the township manager has said the goal is adoption by December 2026. As the manager described it in July 2026, the draft overlay leaves out the Rexroth farm.
Decision body
Conewago Township Board of Supervisors (Chairperson Lorreta Wilhide and Supervisor John MacDonald; Supervisor Brian Klinger has recused himself because he owns property affected by the ordinance), advised by the Conewago Township Planning Commission (Chairman Daryl Hull) and the York County Planning Commission. Under the draft ordinance, any future data center would need conditional use approval from the supervisors.
Top issues
Loss of farmland in an Agricultural zone, constant noise from cooling equipment and diesel backup generators (including low-frequency sound), effects on private wells, higher electric bills, wildlife along Conewago Creek, and trust in the process, since the township solicitor's firm was working for a data center developer and a supervisor owns land that was inside an early version of the overlay.
Key opponents
Residents who filled Bible Baptist Church for the October 27, 2025 planning commission meeting, where about two dozen speakers all opposed the request and a petition with 464 signatures was entered into the record. Neighbors along Bowers Bridge Road, including households whose homes are surrounded by the Rexroth parcels, kept speaking at supervisors meetings through 2026, and anti data center lawn signs line the roads near the farm. The chairperson said in January 2026 that about six Facebook pages are devoted to the issue. Township records don't name a formal organization.
Key supporters
Elysian Partners and the Rexroth family, which farms about 5,400 acres in York County. The farm's owner told the York Daily Record in April 2026 that the hilltop site has poor soil, is crossed by transmission lines from the former Three Mile Island and Brunner Island plants, and would bring tax revenue to the township and Northeastern School District with less impact than housing or warehouses. He said he isn't a data center advocate and wants a rational discussion. No township official has endorsed the project.

How we got here

July 1, 2025: a draft conditional use text amendment for data centers reached the township without an application form or fee. August 25, 2025: Elysian's Kevin Brown presented it to the planning commission. September 22, 2025: a Rexroth Properties representative said the farm's solar option had expired, and Elysian said sound would stay under 60 decibels at the property line. October 27, 2025: more than 100 people filled Bible Baptist Church for a planning commission meeting that ran past 10 p.m.; every speaker opposed the request and a 464-signature petition was filed. December 2, 2025: supervisors hired Eckert Seamans as data center counsel. March 23, 2026: the farm's owner asked to address the next planning commission meeting, but no April meeting was held. July 7, 2026: supervisors adopted a 180-day moratorium (Resolution 2026-13). July 23 and August 20, 2026: special meetings on the township's draft ordinance and overlay map. September 1, 2026: the manager said no applications or plans had been received. September 28, 2026: the planning commission reviewed the latest draft.

What is at stake

Impacts raised and open questions

Noise and vibration

High

The township's September 22, 2026 draft would cap data center sound at homes and other sensitive receptors at 45 dBA by day and 40 dBA at night (60 and 50 on the C-weighted scale that captures low-frequency sound), no more than 5 dBA above measured background levels within 2,500 feet, with compliance measured while backup power is running.

Conewago Township

Environmental justice and site legacy

Medium

Rezoning 541 ac of farmland crossed by TMI/Brunner Island/York Haven transmission; residents cite wildlife on Conewago Creek (eagles, osprey, mink, otter) and rural character.

Keystone Newsroom / York Daily Record

Noise and vibration

Medium

Elysian Partners told the planning commission on September 22, 2025 that sound from the facility, including its backup generators, would be held to a maximum of 60 decibels at the property line.

Conewago Township

Water

Medium

Elysian's Kevin Brown told the planning commission on August 25, 2025 that the facility would provide water only for human consumption and use electricity to cool its computers; in September he said it would mainly rely on air cooling, ideally a closed-loop system.

Conewago Township

Water

Medium

The September 2026 draft would bar a data center from using groundwater or raw water except for dust control during construction, require public water and sewer with a will-serve letter, and allow only air-cooled, closed-loop or hybrid cooling.

Conewago Township

Energy costs and the grid

Medium

The 541-acre site is crossed by several high-voltage transmission lines tied to the former Three Mile Island, Brunner Island and York Haven Hydro plants, which is what drew developers' interest, and residents told the planning commission they feared big increases in their electric bills, according to the York Daily Record.

Keystone Newsroom / York Daily Record

Property values

Medium

At the October 27, 2025 planning commission meeting, owners of homes surrounded by the Rexroth parcels said they didn't think they could sell if a data center were built, and one neighbor said 26 homes and 3 farms surround the property.

Conewago Township

Air quality

Medium

At the July 23, 2026 special meeting, Planning Commission Chairman Daryl Hull asked that backup generators meet Tier 4 emission standards and that all generators be included in testing; the township's attorney said Tier 4 could be added and that generator testing is controlled by DEP.

Conewago Township

Jobs and tax claims

Low

Elysian's Kevin Brown described a typical data center as employing about 120 people over three shifts.

Conewago Township
Community response

Who is organizing against it

Conewago Township residents (vs Rexroth/Elysian)

Single-project · Founded 2025

Leaders: No named leaders; about two dozen residents spoke at the October 27, 2025 meeting

Tactics: 100+ turnout at Bible Baptist Church (Oct 27 2025), 4+ hour meetings, dozens of anti-data center lawn signs along Bowers Bridge Rd, rural-character and farmland-preservation framing

Opposes the Rexroth Farms / Elysian Partners rezoning (P037) in rural York County. Unusual dynamic: the landowner publicly sought dialogue.

Petition to stop AI data centers in Conewago Township

Conewago Township, York County · 464 signatures

Tactics: Residents submitted a petition titled "Petition to stop AI data centers in Conewago Township and protect our community's future" at the October 27, 2025 planning commission meeting, along with written comments.

The minutes list 464 signatures. The township chairperson said in January 2026 that about six Facebook pages discuss the data center issue, but township records don't name them.

Timeline

How it has unfolded

  • 2025-07-01Supervisors noted that a draft conditional use text amendment for data centers had arrived that day without an application form or fee and asked the planning commission to review it first. Conewago Township
  • 2025-08-25Elysian's Kevin Brown presented the company's data center text amendment to the planning commission, describing a typical 750,000-square-foot facility with about 120 employees. Conewago Township
  • 2025-09-22A Rexroth Properties representative said the farm's solar option had expired and offered to help write a text amendment for data centers, and Elysian said sound would be held to 60 decibels at the property line. Conewago Township
  • 2025-10-27100+ residents pack Bible Baptist Church to oppose Rexroth/Elysian data-center rezoning (4+ hours) Keystone Newsroom / York Daily Record
  • 2025-12-02Supervisors voted 2-0, with Supervisor Brian Klinger abstaining, to hire Attorney Brett Flower of Eckert Seamans for data center matters after the township solicitor said his firm was working with a data center developer. Conewago Township
  • 2026-01-05The board chair said the draft text amendments submitted so far were not appropriate for the township and confirmed Supervisor Klinger had recused himself from all data center discussions. Conewago Township
  • 2026-03-23The owner of Rexroth Farms asked to be placed on the planning commission's next agenda to share information about his land and data centers. Conewago Township
  • 2026-04-21The York Daily Record profiled the Rexroth Farms proposal and the farm owner's case for a data center on the 541-acre Bowers Bridge Road parcel. York Daily Record (via AOL)
  • 2026-06-02Supervisors authorized advertising a public workshop to review the township's draft data center ordinance and overlay map. Conewago Township
  • 2026-07-07Supervisors adopted Resolution 2026-13, a 180-day moratorium on data center applications, by a 2-0 vote with Supervisor Klinger abstaining. Conewago Township
  • 2026-07-23A joint special meeting at Bible Baptist Church reviewed the township's draft ordinance, which then called for 100-acre lots, 500-foot setbacks from homes and a 90-foot height limit. Conewago Township
  • 2026-08-20A second special meeting reviewed a revised draft with a 70-foot height cap, closed-loop cooling and larger setbacks, and the manager said the goal was adoption by December 2026. Conewago Township
  • 2026-09-01The township manager told supervisors that no applications or plans for a data center had been received. Conewago Township
  • 2026-09-22The township posted a revised draft ordinance requiring 100 contiguous acres, 1,000-foot yards next to homes and night noise limits of 40 dBA at homes. Conewago Township
  • 2026-09-28The planning commission's agenda listed review of the data center draft ordinance as old business. Conewago Township
Legal record

Filings and legal actions

  • 2026-07-07
    Municipal curative amendment resolution (180-day moratorium on data center applications) Conewago Township Board of Supervisors · Resolution 2026-13

    The resolution pauses data center applications for 180 days while the township writes a data center ordinance. The township's July 23, 2026 presentation says it also keeps a developer from filing a substantive validity challenge over the zoning ordinance's lack of data center provisions during that time.

    Conewago Township · In effect through January 3, 2027
News

Coverage of this project

Sources

Know your rights

In Pennsylvania, the local zoning ordinance sets the route. A conditional use is decided by the elected governing body (supervisors, commissioners or council). A special exception or variance, and an appeal of a zoning officer’s decision, go to the Zoning Hearing Board. Each is a public hearing on a record: affected neighbors can ask for party status, cross-examine witnesses, and appeal. Municipalities can also adopt data center ordinances with enforceable standards.

Know your rights →

Take action

Organized community opposition is the single most effective check on these projects in Pennsylvania. Show up to hearings, submit comment when it is taken, support legal and expert-witness costs, and press your municipality for a real ordinance. Pennsylvania municipalities cannot simply freeze applications, but a curative amendment under the Planning Code gives them a defined window to fix a defective ordinance.

How communities push back →