All Pennsylvania projects
Contested

Slate Belt Technology Campus (River Pointe Data Center)

Upper Mount Bethel Township, Northampton County

Slate Belt Holdings has filed plans for up to 29 data center buildings near the old Portland coal plant, and the township's zoning hearing board has asked the supervisors to decide its challenge to township rules.

ContestedMega scaleGrid HyperscaleMixedLV
At a glance

The project by the numbers

StatusUnder Review
Capacity2100 MW
Building area3,300,000 sq ft
Site905 acres
Water (max)0.035 MGD
Permanent jobs, as claimed1,200
First announced2026-07-23
Target online2029

Talen and River Pointe plan a 2-gigawatt campus on 905 acres by the Delaware

The number that mattersThe developer's Oct. 13 narrative says the campus would have 'up to approximately 2,100 megawatts (MW) of electrical demand' at full build-out, with 1,020 MW now under agreement with FirstEnergy.
Developer
Slate Belt Holdings LLC (joint venture of Talen Energy and Lou Pektor's River Pointe Logistics); RPL East LLC (Pektor-affiliated) for the east-side parcel
Tenant
No tenant named. The developer's narrative says detailed design will be refined through 'customer coordination.'
Current stage
Preliminary land development plans with two alternative layouts were submitted Oct. 13, 2026. On Oct. 19 the Upper Mount Bethel Zoning Hearing Board adjourned the hearing on Slate Belt Holdings' validity challenge (filed July 23), voted to send a letter asking the Board of Supervisors to rule on it, and agreed to reconvene Dec. 17 after the developer granted a 60-day extension. RPL East's challenge (filed Oct. 8) has no hearing date yet. The township's own data center ordinance went to the Lehigh Valley Planning Commission for review after a Sept. 21 vote.
Decision body
Upper Mount Bethel Township Zoning Hearing Board (validity challenges); Upper Mount Bethel Township Board of Supervisors (land development approval and zoning ordinance), with review by the township planning commission and the Lehigh Valley Planning Commission. On Oct. 19 the zoning hearing board said the supervisors should decide Slate Belt Holdings' appeal.
Top issues
Zoning validity challenges and whether data centers are already allowed by right; 2,100 MW power demand and electric rates; on-site generation and battery storage; noise; water; size of the campus next to homes and the township park; the $50 million community benefits offer
Key opponents
Delaware Riverkeeper Network (Delaware Riverkeeper Maya van Rossum urged supervisors to reject the MOU and pass a data center ordinance) and Green Amendments For The Generations, which together represent members of the public in the zoning hearing. Supervisors John Bermingham and David Friedman voted to abandon the developer's MOU.
Key supporters
Talen Energy and River Pointe Logistics. Supervisor Jonathan Erler argued a data center could have the 'least amount of impact' compared with the already approved warehouse park.

How we got here

In 2024 the township zoning officer ruled that a data center is a use permitted by right in the I-2 district, and Amazon Web Services was rumored to be eyeing the site. In April 2025, supervisors discussed a data center field trip while bound by a confidentiality agreement. In April 2026 Slate Belt Holdings bought the three parcels west of River Road. On July 23, 2026 it filed a zoning validity challenge, the day before a special meeting where supervisors approved updated data center performance standards and Talen confirmed it is a partner. The developer's MOU, which offered up to $50 million if the campus reaches 2 gigawatts, was introduced Aug. 10 and revised Aug. 18 and Aug. 25. On Aug. 24 a motion to reject any MOU failed 3-2 and the board hired its solicitor to defend against the challenge. The developer launched a project website in early September. On Sept. 21 supervisors voted 3-1 to send the township's own conditional-use ordinance to the Lehigh Valley Planning Commission and refused to forward the developer's version. On Sept. 28 they discussed hiring a paid consultant to negotiate a benefits agreement and tabled it. RPL East LLC filed a second validity challenge on Oct. 8 for 5027 River Road, and on Oct. 13 Slate Belt Holdings submitted preliminary land development plans and a $50 million benefits term sheet. On Oct. 19 the zoning hearing board adjourned the Slate Belt Holdings hearing, asked the supervisors to rule on the challenge, and agreed to reconvene Dec. 17 after the developer granted a 60-day extension.

What is at stake

Impacts raised and open questions

Energy costs and the grid

High

The developer's narrative puts full build-out at up to about 2,100 MW, with 1,020 MW under agreement with FirstEnergy and about 1,000 MW more expected from a mix of FirstEnergy grid service and on-site generation. It says interconnection costs would be paid under FirstEnergy's regulated tariffs.

Slate Belt Holdings LLC (land development submission)

Air quality

Medium

Plans include Tier 4 equivalent standby generators and leave room for on-site generation and battery storage, with final capacity to be set later. RPL East's filing for the east side includes an electric generation facility and a large battery storage area.

Slate Belt Holdings LLC (land development submission)

Water

Medium

The developer says cooling will be closed-loop, filled from an off-site source, with no use of on-site wells or the Delaware River. Domestic water would be about 35,000 gallons a day under Design 1 from an extension of Portland Borough Authority service, plus about 5 million gallons of on-site fire water storage.

Slate Belt Holdings LLC (land development submission)

Noise and vibration

Medium

The narrative names chillers, transformers and standby generators as the main outdoor sound sources and promises a site acoustical study, sound-attenuated generator enclosures and weekday daytime generator testing. Residents raised noise at township meetings.

Slate Belt Holdings LLC (land development submission)

Visual and light

Medium

The developer's Design 1 calls for buildings about 80 feet tall (Design 2, 35 feet), while the township ordinance sent to county review caps data center height at 45 feet. Plans include a landscape berm where the site borders the Upper Mount Bethel Township Community Park.

Slate Belt Holdings LLC (land development submission)
Community response

Who is organizing against it

Delaware Riverkeeper Network

Regional (Delaware River watershed) · Founded 1988

Leaders: Maya K. van Rossum, the Delaware Riverkeeper

Tactics: Online letter campaign to supervisors; public comment at township meetings

Asked supervisors to reject the MOU, get an independent legal assessment of the validity challenge and pass a comprehensive data center ordinance.

Website · Petition · Donate

Green Amendments For The Generations

Environmental rights organization taking part in the Upper Mount Bethel proceedings

Tactics: Represents members of the public in the zoning hearing alongside the Delaware Riverkeeper Network; issued joint action alerts and talking points urging supervisors to reject the developer's MOU and to oppose the validity challenge

Co-author with the Delaware Riverkeeper Network of the August 2026 action alert on the Slate Belt Holdings MOU.

Website

Timeline

How it has unfolded

  • 2025-04-14Supervisors discuss a field trip to study data centers while bound by a confidentiality agreement, as a data center is rumored for the River Pointe site. WFMZ-TV 69 News
  • 2026-07-23Slate Belt Holdings files a zoning validity challenge saying the township's ordinance is exclusionary toward data centers, with a concept plan for 23 buildings on 754 acres. WFMZ-TV 69 News
  • 2026-07-24At a special meeting supervisors approve updated data center performance standards, and Talen Energy confirms it is a partner in Slate Belt Holdings. WFMZ-TV 69 News
  • 2026-08-10Supervisors review the developer's memorandum of understanding offering $50 million if the campus reaches 2 gigawatts and ask for more time. WFMZ-TV 69 News
  • 2026-08-17A meeting on the MOU is packed beyond capacity and postponed. WFMZ-TV 69 News
  • 2026-08-24A motion to reject any MOU fails 3-2, and the board hires its solicitor to defend against the validity challenge. WFMZ-TV 69 News
  • 2026-08-25The township posts a revised MOU that adds water use and decommissioning terms. WFMZ-TV 69 News
  • 2026-09-04The developer unveils a project website showing 23 data center buildings of 201,500 square feet each. WFMZ-TV 69 News
  • 2026-09-21Supervisors vote 3-1 to send the township's own data center ordinance, which makes data centers a conditional use, to the Lehigh Valley Planning Commission; the developer's version gets no second. WFMZ-TV 69 News
  • 2026-09-28Supervisors discuss hiring a consultant to negotiate a community benefits agreement and table the matter. PennLive (via Yahoo News)
  • 2026-10-08RPL East files a second validity challenge for about 152 acres at 5027 River Road, the former Portland Generating Station, seeking data centers and an electric generation facility. WFMZ-TV 69 News
  • 2026-10-13Slate Belt Holdings submits preliminary land development plans with two layouts and an updated $50 million community benefits term sheet. WFMZ-TV 69 News
  • 2026-10-19The zoning hearing board adjourns the hearing on Slate Belt Holdings' validity challenge, votes to send a letter asking the supervisors to rule on the appeal, and agrees to reconvene Dec. 17 after the developer's attorney grants a 60-day extension. WFMZ-TV 69 News
Legal record

Filings and legal actions

  • 2026-07-23
    Zoning validity challenge (substantive challenge to zoning ordinance) Upper Mount Bethel Township Zoning Hearing Board · n/a

    Argues the zoning ordinance is unlawfully exclusionary toward data centers and asks for site-specific relief or a ruling that a data center is permitted by right in the I-2 district as a 'high technology industry' or 'general industrial' use.

    Slate Belt Holdings LLC v. Upper Mount Bethel Township · Hearing scheduled for Oct. 19, 2026
  • 2026-10-08
    Zoning validity challenge Upper Mount Bethel Township Zoning Hearing Board · n/a

    Seeks a ruling that data centers and an electric generation facility are permitted by right on the roughly 152-acre former Portland Generating Station site at 5027 River Road in the I-3 Heavy Industrial District.

    RPL East LLC v. Upper Mount Bethel Township · Filed; hearing not yet scheduled
  • 2026-07-23
    Substantive validity challenge and request for favorable use class determination Upper Mount Bethel Township Zoning Hearing Board · n/a

    Challenges two sections of the zoning ordinance as exclusionary toward data centers on about 754 acres west of River Road and seeks site-specific relief, or in the alternative a determination that data centers are permitted by right as a high technology industry or general industrial use, plus interpretations of five ordinance sections.

    Slate Belt Holdings LLC (applicant, attorney Sean Gallagher); Upper Mount Bethel Township; members of the public represented by the Delaware Riverkeeper Network and Green Amendments For The Generations · Hearing adjourned Oct. 19, 2026; the board asked the Board of Supervisors to rule and agreed to reconvene Dec. 17 after the applicant granted a 60-day extension
News

Coverage of this project

Sources

Know your rights

In Pennsylvania, the local zoning ordinance sets the route. A conditional use is decided by the elected governing body (supervisors, commissioners or council). A special exception or variance, and an appeal of a zoning officer’s decision, go to the Zoning Hearing Board. Each is a public hearing on a record: affected neighbors can ask for party status, cross-examine witnesses, and appeal. Municipalities can also adopt data center ordinances with enforceable standards.

Know your rights →

Take action

Organized community opposition is the single most effective check on these projects in Pennsylvania. Show up to hearings, submit comment when it is taken, support legal and expert-witness costs, and press your municipality for a real ordinance. Pennsylvania municipalities cannot simply freeze applications, but a curative amendment under the Planning Code gives them a defined window to fix a defective ordinance.

How communities push back →