Water
High2.8 MGD water demand from GHJSA; key denial factor.
Hazle Township, Luzerne County
NorthPoint Development wanted 15 data center buildings and a substation on nearly 1,300 acres in Luzerne County. Residents in yellow "Project Hazelnot" shirts packed meeting after meeting until the supervisors voted unanimously to pause all data center applications.
NorthPoint presented a 15-building plan for Humboldt Industrial Park North with construction phases slated to begin in late 2026, 2028 and 2029, and DEP records show it began filing state permits in December 2024. Hazle Township supervisors voted 3-0 in November 2025 to deny the land development plan after opponents argued the project first needed a special exception from the Zoning Hearing Board. DEP held a public hearing on the stream and stormwater permits at Hazleton Area High School in February 2026. On May 19, 2026 NorthPoint offered a $30 million fund to offset utility rate increases, and later that month a Luzerne County judge ruled against its appeal. Supervisors unanimously adopted a 180-day curative amendment on June 8, 2026, and on June 24 NorthPoint raised its offer to $165 million, including $10,000 per eligible household, while appealing to Commonwealth Court. PPL began eminent domain filings for a related transmission line in July 2026, and the state removed all data centers from Fast Track on August 18, 2026.
Update, October 26, 2026. On October 23, 2026, reply briefs were filed in the PUC case over PPL's 1.1 miles of 230 kV taps to the new Tomhicken switchyard in Hazle Township, following evidentiary hearings before administrative law judges on September 17 and 18 and main briefs on October 8 and 9; no decision had been posted as of October 26.
2.8 MGD water demand from GHJSA; key denial factor.
Up to 2.8 MGD of treated wastewater for cooling (recirculated 3x); NorthPoint funds a pipeline and treatment-plant upgrades so MAHT/GHJSA ratepayers don't pay.
WVIAProposed 500-kV transmission line drew opposition from Sugarloaf, Black Creek, Nescopeck, and Hollenback townships, communities outside the grant-eligible zone.
Fox56Nearly 1,300 acres on a coal-scarred plateau in a county that already carries three federal Superfund sites. Residents framed the project as reopening old wounds from the coal era.
Inside Climate News / PA Capital-StarFifteen data center buildings and a dedicated substation would add substantial load in a region already absorbing rapid data center growth.
Inside Climate News / PA Capital-StarNorthPoint says cooling would use up to 2.8 million gallons of treated wastewater from the Greater Hazleton Joint Sewer Authority, cycled three times, with roughly 70 percent evaporating. Water would leave the campus around 90 degrees, and treated water goes to Black Creek, whose flow could drop by 5.5 percent.
WVIAPPL named 30 properties in eminent domain filings, seeking anywhere from a few square feet to 27.3 acres, for a transmission upgrade with poles averaging 200 feet tall that includes a new switchyard at the west end of the Hazelnut site.
Shenandoah SentinelExisting CAN DO industrial park traffic concerns amplified.
Residents raised water consumption alongside power draw and land conversion in an area with a legacy of polluted streams and waste coal.
Inside Climate News / PA Capital-StarA campus of this scale with an electrical substation drew noise and quality-of-life objections at packed supervisor meetings.
Inside Climate News / PA Capital-StarNorthPoint's engineering director said cooling equipment would run about 45 decibels at the property line and about 55 during generator testing, with Tier 4 generators tested about twice a month. The closest neighbor is the Eagle Rock Resort community.
WVIANorthPoint says it has secured power capacity with long-term service commitments, minimum demand guarantees and financial protections with PPL meant to make the project pay for transmission upgrades, and it offered a $30 million fund to offset short-term rate increases for township households.
Times LeaderRoughly 17 percent of Hazle Township residents live below the poverty line, and many residents described NorthPoint's $10,000 per household offer, payable once the first building opens, as a bribe.
CybernewsThe developer pitched 900 jobs and later a $165 million community benefits package offered after losing legal rounds, which critics characterized as a bribe.
Inside Climate News / PA Capital-StarLeaders: Supported by Food & Water Watch organizer Ginny Marcille-Kerslake
Tactics: Packing supervisor meetings, yellow "Project Hazelnot" shirts with a red slash through the o, sustained public comment, pressure for a municipal moratorium and rewritten zoning, regional rallies with Luzerne and Schuylkill County neighbors
Residents forced a unanimous 180-day pause on June 8, 2026 after the township had already denied land development approval and a judge had rebuked the developer’s appeal. One of the clearest examples in Pennsylvania of sustained local turnout converting into an enforceable municipal pause.
Tactics: Online organizing against Project Hazelnut and its power lines
Named by the Times Leader as the Facebook page where opponents criticized the $165 million package. We didn't find its web address.
Leaders: Ginny Marcille-Kerslake, Eastern Pennsylvania senior organizer
Tactics: Press statements, meeting turnout and a push for state and national data center moratoriums
Its take-action page is https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/get-involved/.
Appeal of the 3-0 Hazle Township denial of Project Hazelnut.
NorthPoint vs Hazle Township · PendingAppeal of the 3-0 denial of Project Hazelnut; Luzerne County CCP upheld objections, NorthPoint escalated to Commonwealth Court. DEP permitting proceeds in parallel.
NorthPoint (NP Hazleton Holdings 1 LLC) vs Hazle Township · Pending (after Luzerne CCP upheld denial)Municipal curative amendment temporarily invalidating portions of the township zoning ordinance for 180 days, pausing all new data center applications while the township writes data center standards and shielding the ordinance from defect challenges during that window.
Hazle Township · AdoptedThe court rebuked the developer’s appeal of the township’s land development denial and held the proposal should proceed through the zoning board via the special exception process.
NorthPoint Development v. Hazle Township · DecidedPPL seeks approval for 1.1 miles of new double-circuit 230 kV taps in Hazle Township connecting the Susquehanna-Harwood lines to a new Tomhicken 230 kV switchyard. PPL says it is separate from its Sugarloaf 500/230 kV line project.
PPL Electric Utilities; protesting residents · Pending; public input hearings held June 30, 2026, with phase one evidentiary hearings expected in September 2026PPL is using eminent domain for a larger transmission line with poles averaging 200 feet tall. Its filings cite projected load growth from multiple new customers requesting 230 kV service in the Hazleton area, and the project includes the Tomhicken switchyard at the west end of the Hazelnut campus.
PPL Electric Utilities; owners of 30 properties along the Sugarloaf line route · Pending; 19 protests filed with the PUC as of July 28, 2026PPL's proposal to build about 1.1 miles of new parallel double-circuit 230 kV taps in Luzerne County connecting the Susquehanna-Harwood #1 and #2 lines to the new Tomhicken 230 kV switchyard.
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation (applicant); Office of Consumer Advocate (intervenor); two individual protestants · Active; evidentiary hearings held September 17 and 18, 2026, main briefs filed October 8 and 9, reply briefs filed October 23, 2026; no decision postedIn Pennsylvania, the local zoning ordinance sets the route. A conditional use is decided by the elected governing body (supervisors, commissioners or council). A special exception or variance, and an appeal of a zoning officer’s decision, go to the Zoning Hearing Board. Each is a public hearing on a record: affected neighbors can ask for party status, cross-examine witnesses, and appeal. Municipalities can also adopt data center ordinances with enforceable standards.
Know your rights →Organized community opposition is the single most effective check on these projects in Pennsylvania. Show up to hearings, submit comment when it is taken, support legal and expert-witness costs, and press your municipality for a real ordinance. Pennsylvania municipalities cannot simply freeze applications, but a curative amendment under the Planning Code gives them a defined window to fix a defective ordinance.
How communities push back →