All Pennsylvania projects
Contested

Powder Mills Data Center Campus (Stonebridge Associates / S.S. Penn, former Powder Mill Works property, North Beaver and Mahoning townships)

North Beaver Township and Mahoning Township, Lawrence County

Stonebridge Associates and its affiliate S.S. Penn want to build 16 data center buildings on 569 acres of the former Powder Mill Works site in North Beaver and Mahoning townships, but both townships rejected its early applications and the company is fighting that in court.

ContestedTBD/Undisclosed (Stonebridge said it would work with FirstEnergy and pay for transmission upgrades; directories list Penn Power as the provider)BrownfieldSW
At a glance

The project by the numbers

StatusOn Appeal
Site569 acres
Capex$ 15 B
Permanent jobs, as claimed400
First announced2026-06-02

Maryland developer's 16-building campus on old Lawrence County dynamite plant tied up in zoning appeals

The number that mattersStonebridge's own attorney told the North Beaver zoning board that if the township's June rules apply, the company 'might not have a project.'
Developer
Stonebridge Associates Inc. (Bethesda, Maryland) and its affiliate S.S. Penn, LLC; the land is owned by Powder Mill Works, LLC
Tenant
No tenant or operator named
Current stage
The townships rejected Stonebridge's June 2 and June 9 applications over fee errors and treated the accepted June 15 application under amended, stricter rules that make data centers a conditional use. North Beaver's and Mahoning's zoning hearing boards both denied the company's appeals, Mahoning's on September 15, 2026. A county judge dismissed the company's lawsuit against both townships in July, and that dismissal is on appeal to Commonwealth Court.
Decision body
Mahoning Township Board of Supervisors and North Beaver Township supervisors (land development and conditional use); each township's zoning hearing board; Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas and Commonwealth Court on appeal
Top issues
Which ordinance applies (April rules or the stricter June amendment), fee and escrow errors in the applications, contamination at a former explosives plant, power and transmission upgrades, water, noise, and community transparency
Key opponents
Mahoning Township and North Beaver Township, represented by solicitor Lou Perrotta, are contesting the company's appeals. An informal citizens group was reported by WFMJ but not named.
Key supporters
Stonebridge Associates and S.S. Penn, LLC

How we got here

April 14, 2026: Mahoning supervisors pass a data center ordinance. May 12, 2026: WFMJ reports the ordinance language was made more specific. June 2 and June 9, 2026: applications rejected over fee errors. June 9, 2026: Mahoning supervisors note the land development application was twice returned as incomplete. June 15, 2026: application accepted under the amended ordinance. July 2026: Judge Bradley G. Olson Jr. dismisses Stonebridge's lawsuit; the company appeals to Commonwealth Court. July 14, 2026: Mahoning supervisors vote to contest both appeals. July 20, 2026: Stonebridge presents plans in New Castle. August 2026: North Beaver zoning hearing on the application. September 15, 2026: Mahoning zoning hearing board denies S.S. Penn's appeal 2 to 0.

Timeline

How it has unfolded

  • 2026-04-14Supervisors passed the township's first data center ordinance. WFMJ
  • 2026-05-12WFMJ reported that supervisors made the ordinance more specific on space, noise and utility use. WFMJ
  • 2026-06-02The company filed its first data center application, which the zoning office rejected because the fee check was wrong and the $3,000 escrow deposit was missing. New Castle News
  • 2026-06-04The zoning officer issued the June 4 zoning letter on S.S. Penn's preliminary land development plan that the company later appealed. Mahoning Township
  • 2026-06-09A second application was filed and also deemed incorrect, partly because the check listed the wrong address. New Castle News
  • 2026-06-09Supervisors said the land development application had twice been deemed incomplete and returned for incorrect fees, and scheduled June 24 public hearings on data center, power plant and battery storage ordinances. Mahoning Township
  • 2026-06-15A third application was accepted, after supervisors had amended the ordinance to make data centers a conditional use with stricter conditions. New Castle News
  • 2026-07-14Supervisors voted unanimously to contest the preliminary land development appeal in county court and S.S. Penn's zoning hearing board appeal. Mahoning Township
  • 2026-07-20WFMJ reported Stonebridge is suing North Beaver and Mahoning townships, arguing zoning rules adopted after it submitted plans shouldn't apply. WFMJ
  • 2026-07-20Principal Douglas Firstenberg presented a 10 to 16 building plan at a public meeting in New Castle, where residents voiced opposition. WFMJ
  • 2026-08-05WKBN reported on North Beaver's zoning hearing over whether the application was filed on time with the right fees; the board said it would decide within 45 days. WKBN
  • 2026-09-03The township posted notice of a September 15 zoning hearing board meeting to decide S.S. Penn's appeal. Mahoning Township
  • 2026-09-15The zoning hearing board voted 2 to 0 to deny the appeal by Stonebridge Associates and S.S. Penn, LLC. New Castle News
Legal record

Filings and legal actions

  • Lawsuit / land use appeal against both townships Lawrence County Court of Common Pleas · n/a

    The company argues zoning restrictions adopted after it submitted plans shouldn't apply to its project. Mahoning supervisors voted July 14 to contest the preliminary land development appeal in county court.

    Stonebridge Associates Inc. (and affiliate S.S. Penn, LLC) v. North Beaver Township and Mahoning Township · Dismissed in July 2026 by Judge Bradley G. Olson Jr.; appealed to Commonwealth Court
  • Appeal of Common Pleas dismissal Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · n/a

    The company appealed Judge Olson's July dismissal of its lawsuit to Commonwealth Court.

    Stonebridge Associates Inc. / S.S. Penn, LLC v. North Beaver Township and Mahoning Township · Pending as of September 17, 2026 reporting
  • Zoning hearing board appeal Mahoning Township Zoning Hearing Board · n/a

    Appeal of the June 4, 2026 zoning letter on S.S. Penn's preliminary land development plan for property owned by Powder Mill Works, LLC. The board found the June 2 and June 9 applications incomplete. The company could appeal to county court within 30 days.

    S.S. Penn, LLC and Stonebridge Associates Inc. v. Mahoning Township Zoning Officer · Denied 2 to 0 on September 15, 2026
  • Zoning hearing board appeal North Beaver Township Zoning Hearing Board · n/a

    Appeal of the zoning officer's rejection of the application over a missing $3,000 county escrow fee; a hearing was reported August 5, 2026, and the New Castle News later reported the board rejected the appeals.

    Stonebridge Associates / S.S. Penn, LLC v. North Beaver Township Zoning Officer · Rejected (date not reported)
News

Coverage of this project

Sources

Know your rights

In Pennsylvania, the local zoning ordinance sets the route. A conditional use is decided by the elected governing body (supervisors, commissioners or council). A special exception or variance, and an appeal of a zoning officer’s decision, go to the Zoning Hearing Board. Each is a public hearing on a record: affected neighbors can ask for party status, cross-examine witnesses, and appeal. Municipalities can also adopt data center ordinances with enforceable standards.

Know your rights →

Take action

Organized community opposition is the single most effective check on these projects in Pennsylvania. Show up to hearings, submit comment when it is taken, support legal and expert-witness costs, and press your municipality for a real ordinance. Pennsylvania municipalities cannot simply freeze applications, but a curative amendment under the Planning Code gives them a defined window to fix a defective ordinance.

How communities push back →