Energy costs and the grid
HighPPL feasibility report cites up to 1,500 MW transmission load, over half the peak load of Duquesne Light's entire territory.
Data Center DynamicsClifton Township and Covington Township, Lackawanna County
A data center campus first pitched at up to 35 buildings, 1,500 megawatts and about 1,000 acres along Interstate 380 in Clifton and Covington townships, Lackawanna County, near Gouldsboro, for an end user that still hasn't been named.
April 17, 2025: 1778 Rich Pike files a validity challenge in Clifton. May 22, 2025: Clifton adopts a data center ordinance. June 20, 2025: developer and landowner JCO LLC sue Clifton over how the ordinance was adopted. July 24, 2025: Covington votes 3-2 to add a data center district and rezone seven parcels. Sept. 29, 2025: Clifton supervisors reject a settlement 2-1. Nov. 19, 2025: Clifton's zoning board upholds its ordinance; the developer appeals Nov. 26. Jan. 2, 2026: Clifton approves a revised settlement; a judge signs it Jan. 5 and then denies it in late January. Aug. 19, 2026: Judge Mark Powell voids Clifton's 2025 ordinance. August 2026: Quantm Group files a conditional use application in Covington. Fall 2026: Clifton holds hearings on a new ordinance.
PPL feasibility report cites up to 1,500 MW transmission load, over half the peak load of Duquesne Light's entire territory.
Data Center DynamicsMost Clifton and Covington residents rely on private wells, and a neighboring landowning family told WVIA that Round Swamp went dry in 2014 when a bottled water company drew down a well nearby. The developer's lawyer said in February 2026 that the end user would truck in water for cooling.
WVIA NewsEarly plans would have needed zoning changes for buildings up to 120 feet tall and water towers and other structures up to 200 feet, on forested land along Route 380.
FOX56 (WOLF)Global Energy Monitor lists a 1,500 megawatt gas-fired power station tied to the project, owned by 1778 Rich Pike LLC, as in pre-construction.
Global Energy Monitor wikiClifton's revised Ordinance No. 2-2026 (October 14, 2026 draft) would treat any data center plan to draw more than 25,000 gallons a day from local ground or surface water as a separately regulated large-scale water extraction use, and it requires a water feasibility study with any conditional use application.
Clifton TownshipAt an October 2025 zoning hearing, the developer's own design expert said he had never worked with a noise ordinance as strict as Clifton's and likely couldn't design a data center to meet it.
WVIA NewsClifton's 2025 ordinance capped buildings at 35 feet. The January 2026 settlement, later denied by the court, would have allowed 65-foot buildings plus up to 15 feet of rooftop equipment, with buildings at least 400 feet from occupied homes.
WVIA NewsThe Pocono Heritage Land Trust, which holds a conservation easement on more than 700 adjoining acres, warned the campus would bring light and noise pollution, raise electric bills and hurt property values.
WVIA NewsTactics: Detailed document-based analysis of the Gouldsboro filings, township-meeting turnout, opposition to substantive-validity challenge and SALDO applications
Tracks the 1,000-acre, up-to-35-building Gouldsboro campus straddling Clifton and Covington (Lackawanna County). It publicized the PPL feasibility report, which cites up to 1,500 MW.
Leaders: Louise Troutman, executive director
Tactics: Public comment; petitioned to intervene in Lackawanna County Court through PennFuture
Holds a conservation easement on more than 700 acres next to the site.
Leaders: Richard Troscianecki, president
Tactics: Public comment and press on water, habitat and Lehigh River watershed concerns
Tactics: Online organizing
Named by Data Center Dynamics as mobilizing opposition.
Tactics: Petition
Signature count as shown on October 22, 2026.
Challenge claims Clifton's zoning ordinance is unconstitutional for failing to provide for data-center uses; seeks site-specific relief (the Gouldsboro campus).
1778 Rich Pike LLC v. Clifton Township · Zoning Hearing Board upheld the ordinance Nov. 19, 2025; developer appealed Nov. 26, 2025; the court later voided the 2025 ordinance on Aug. 19, 2026Claimed Clifton adopted its May 2025 data center ordinance in violation of the Sunshine Act and other procedures.
1778 Rich Pike LLC and JCO LLC v. Clifton Township · Decided: Judge Mark Powell ruled Clifton's 2025 data center ordinance void on Aug. 19, 2026Appeal of the Nov. 19, 2025 zoning board decision. The Jan. 2, 2026 settlement with Clifton supervisors was struck because the zoning board was not a party to it.
1778 Rich Pike LLC v. Clifton Township Zoning Hearing Board; petitions by the zoning board, Covington Township and PennFuture for the Pocono Heritage Land Trust · Settlement signed Jan. 5, 2026, then denied in late January 2026New challenge to Clifton's data center zoning with a proposed curative amendment, filed by attorney Matthew McHugh.
1778 Rich Pike LLC v. Clifton Township · PendingApplication for a Data Center and Energy Technology Campus in Covington's data center district.
Quantm Group LLC (attorney Anthony Maras) · Under completeness review; hearing officer not yet hired; extension on Oct. 6, 2026 agendaIn Pennsylvania, the local zoning ordinance sets the route. A conditional use is decided by the elected governing body (supervisors, commissioners or council). A special exception or variance, and an appeal of a zoning officer’s decision, go to the Zoning Hearing Board. Each is a public hearing on a record: affected neighbors can ask for party status, cross-examine witnesses, and appeal. Municipalities can also adopt data center ordinances with enforceable standards.
Know your rights →Organized community opposition is the single most effective check on these projects in Pennsylvania. Show up to hearings, submit comment when it is taken, support legal and expert-witness costs, and press your municipality for a real ordinance. Pennsylvania municipalities cannot simply freeze applications, but a curative amendment under the Planning Code gives them a defined window to fix a defective ordinance.
How communities push back →