All Pennsylvania projects
Contested

900 Conshohocken Road Data Center (O'Neill)

Plymouth Township, Montgomery County

J. Brian O'Neill's two-million-square-foot AI data center on the former Cleveland-Cliffs steel mill, roughly 200 feet from homes, opposed by residents with party status, Plymouth Township Council, Conshohocken Borough, and regional environmental groups.

ContestedBrownfieldSE
At a glance

The project by the numbers

StatusApplication Filed
Footprint2,000,000 sq ft
Site66 acres
Capex$ 9 B
First announced2025-09-19
Target onlineTBD

A gas-fired power plant next to a neighborhood, and a developer who has stopped negotiating

The number that mattersOn December 26, 2025 the developer asked a lawyer then serving at the U.S. State Department whether there was "any flexibility in that 25-ton number," the trigger for the strictest air pollution requirements Pennsylvania applies. Twelve days later the request had reached the Public Utility Commission chairman’s chief of staff, and two days after that MLP Ventures was on a video call with the commission.
Developer
MLP Ventures (J. Brian O'Neill) via 900 Conshohocken Road LLC
Tenant
Undisclosed. O'Neill has declined to name the end user, describing it only as related to the life sciences.
Current stage
Evidentiary hearings resume September 17 at 7:00 p.m. in the Karen B. Weiss Meeting Room, with the applicant's first witness still on direct. The separate validity challenge must be heard by September 25 and no date has been announced.
Decision body
Plymouth Township Zoning Hearing Board
Top issues
An undisclosed-size 24/7 gas turbine plant roughly 200 feet from homes; low-frequency noise with no township cap; makeup water and Schuylkill River impacts; PJM capacity costs borne by all ratepayers; the applicant’s challenge to the zoning ordinance itself; refusal to disclose experts in advance; tenant secrecy
Key opponents
No Conshy Data Centers and twelve residents holding party status; Plymouth Township Council (solicitor authorized to oppose); Borough of Conshohocken Authority; Conshohocken Borough Council (seeking party status, vote set August 5); State Rep. Gregory Scott; Delaware Riverkeeper Network; Sierra Club Pennsylvania; Energy Justice Network
Key supporters
Gov. Shapiro (data centers generally); building trades unions (turnout)

Mill idled May 2025; closed June 30 2025 (110 jobs). 1st ZHB app Sept 19 2025; Planning Agency 4-0 against Oct 1 2025; withdrawn Nov 17 2025 (standing defect). Refiled May 1 2026; hearing set June 25 2026; Council opposed June 9 2026. First hearing held June 25 2026: party status granted to the township, the Borough of Conshohocken Authority, and 12 residents; no testimony taken; continued to July 28 with July 30 likely. Township announced July 14 2026 that the hearing is continued from July 28 to August 6 at the parties' request for additional preparation time. Conshohocken Borough Council directed its solicitor July 15 2026 to prepare a party-status request, with the authorizing vote set for August 5. July 27 2026: council publicly disclosed 43 proposed safeguards, the applicant's rejection of all of them, and the applicant's filing challenging the validity of the zoning ordinance. July 27 2026: council disclosed 43 proposed conditions offered as a memorandum of understanding, the applicant's rejection of all of them, and his substantive validity challenge to the zoning ordinance. August 6 2026: hearing resumed to a near-capacity auditorium; party status granted to the Borough of Conshohocken and six individuals, Norristown refused; opposing motions denied; continued to August 17 for scheduling only. UPDATE (2026-08-24): On July 21 the applicant filed a substantive validity challenge arguing the zoning ordinance fails to provide for data centers, running it in the alternative to the pending special exception in what land-use counsel describe as a dual-track strategy. The township deemed that application complete on July 27, which requires hearings on it to begin by September 25. On July 27 the Township Council said publicly that the applicant walked back conditions from a 43-point list the council had presented, with Council President Lynne Viscio saying the township would not be bullied or intimidated; the developer told reporters he had accepted most of the conditions. At the August 6 session the applicant's planner testified that data centers share the characteristics of manufacturing, research and development, and warehousing, all listed uses, and counsel Edmund Campbell argued that a project similar in character to a listed use is entitled to that use. On August 17 the board voted to continue the matter to September 17 at 7:00 p.m. and to move the evidentiary hearings from the 750-seat Colonial Middle School auditorium to the Karen B. Weiss Meeting Room, which seats roughly 200, with livestream and an overflow viewing room at the Greater Plymouth Community Center. UPDATE (2026-09-10): The applicant's first witness on August 6 was Richard Roseberry, a senior principal at Colliers Engineering and Design, whose qualification as an expert was challenged by counsel for several parties and accepted by the board. Motions challenging the adequacy of the application were denied. The session ran nearly two and a half hours and ended before his direct testimony was complete, so no party has yet cross-examined him. O'Neill did not attend, and told the Inquirer afterward that if the township does not work with him in good faith he intends to get the use by right, which is the validity challenge stated plainly. The petition against the project passed 4,000 signatures in early August. On August 7 the township launched a Data Center Information page collecting livestreams, statements, and filings. As of September 10 the township has posted no date for the validity challenge hearing, which must open by September 25.

What is at stake

Documented community impacts

Environmental justice and site legacy

High

Connaughtown neighborhood adjacency; predominantly working-class residential.

Plymouth Township

Noise and vibration

High

55-85 dB projected from cooling/generators in residential area.

Plymouth Township

Air quality

High

Backup diesel generators near residential and Schuylkill River.

Plymouth Township

Energy costs and the grid

High

O'Neill's own figures: a 'GW' data center pegged at $35.16B; phase 1 pitched as $44M taxes + $30M+ to the school district, opponents counter with ratepayer/grid risk.

North Penn Now

Air quality

High

The application discloses gas turbines located within and between the buildings but has never disclosed total megawatts, turbine count, annual operating hours, or property-line limits for nitrogen oxides or fine particulates. Council's 43 conditions require Tier 4 standards for generators, a federal standard for compression-ignition engines that does not reach combustion turbines.

Plymouth Township

Noise and vibration

High

Council proposed octave-band limits at the property line of 65 dB at 16 hertz, 60 dB at 31.5 hertz, 55 dB at 63 hertz and 50 dB at 125 hertz, the low-frequency range that carries furthest and disturbs sleep. Plymouth Township has no comparable low-frequency cap in its existing ordinance, and the applicant rejected the proposed conditions.

Patch

Energy costs and the grid

High

Council asked that the project be power self-sufficient through on-site generation and not draw from public utilities, which locks in an on-site power plant next to homes. Every additional gigawatt of Pennsylvania data center load raises the PJM capacity price that all ratepayers already pay.

Patch

Air quality

High

Right to Know records show the developer told the Governor’s office on September 4, 2025 that the plan includes "an 800 megawatt power plant" at a $1 billion additional cost, a figure never disclosed in the zoning application or in testimony. An 800 MW gas plant is in the class of large stations that anchor regions of the grid, proposed roughly 200 feet from homes.

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (RTK release)

Noise and vibration

High

The applicant’s own Preliminary Environmental Noise Assessment finds the project’s 227 chillers within acceptable limits only in a scenario that depends on sound attenuation products which do not currently exist for this equipment. The same report concedes that site conditions cannot be reproduced, meaning the ordinance limit could not be verified by measurement after the fact.

Auxia Design

Air quality

High

The assessment models six generators on a tract across Conshohocken Road that no application before the zoning hearing board covers, feeding a microgrid whose total megawatts appear nowhere in the document.

Auxia Design

Air quality

High

Right to Know records show the developer asked a federal official in December 2025 about "flexibility" in the 25-ton per year threshold at which a new source of VOCs or nitrogen oxides in Montgomery County becomes a major facility subject to the lowest achievable emission rate and offsetting reductions. Five months later he told Upper Merion residents that the claim data centers reduce air quality was a myth.

DeSmog

Water

Medium

Schuylkill well water source; Delaware Riverkeeper flagged §27 environmental rights.

Plymouth Township

Property values

Medium

GMU Schar/Clower-Waters Nov 2025 study shows mixed effects.

Traffic

Medium

Construction traffic; ~370-1,200 signatures across 3 petitions.

Plymouth Township

Water

Medium

Council asked for a closed-loop, non-toxic cooling system with no withdrawal from the Schuylkill River or any public water system and no discharge to the river, plus annual water consumption reporting. The applicant rejected the condition package; makeup water volumes remain undisclosed.

Patch

Public safety

Medium

Council sought an emergency response plan reviewed by the fire department before permits, first-responder training at the applicant’s expense, NFPA 855 compliance for battery storage, and in-building radio coverage for emergency responders. The applicant declined the package.

Patch

Environmental justice and site legacy

Medium

The site is a former Cleveland-Cliffs steel plate mill on the Schuylkill River, roughly 200 feet from homes in the Connaughtown area, with legacy industrial contamination and a decommissioning bond among the conditions the applicant rejected.

Patch

Environmental justice and site legacy

Medium

In seeking expedited state environmental review, the developer described the former steel plate mill as "a former plating operation" and told the Governor’s office "We believe the site to be clean environmentally," while asking for fast track treatment from DEP on a short as-is closing window.

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (RTK release)

Environmental justice and site legacy

Medium

The noise assessment is silent on three of the four neighboring municipalities, and the board separately refused Norristown party status on the reasoning that its concern was general rather than specific, leaving thousands of nearby households outside both the analysis and the proceeding.

MoreThanTheCurve

Jobs and tax claims

Low

<50 permanent jobs vs 110 steel jobs lost June 30 2025.

Cleveland-Cliffs
Community response

Who is organizing against it

No Conshy Data Centers

Single-project · 4,000 signatures

Tactics: Party status at the Zoning Hearing Board for twelve residents; written demands for advance expert disclosure under MPC Section 908(4); packed hearings at Colonial Middle School; petition drive; community legal fund; statewide project tracker; sustained local and regional press engagement

Residents of Plymouth Township, Conshohocken and the surrounding area. Twelve residents hold party status alongside the Township Solicitor and the Borough of Conshohocken Authority, and Conshohocken Borough Council directed its solicitor on July 15, 2026 to seek party status as well, with the authorizing vote set for August 5. State Rep. Gregory Scott wrote the board's solicitor on June 29 urging use of the board's authority under MPC Section 908(4) to compel production of witnesses and documents.

Website · Facebook · Petition

Timeline

How it has unfolded

  • 2023-11-01State staff confirm internally that a decline notice was sent on O’Neill’s funding request, on an email chain circulating the headline "Unpaid contractors file more than $125M in liens against Discovery Labs" Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (RTK release)
  • 2025-05-07Cleveland-Cliffs announces idling of Conshohocken steel mill Cleveland-Cliffs
  • 2025-06-30Conshohocken plant ceases operations; 110 jobs lost Cleveland-Cliffs
  • 2025-07-01Internal email from Chief Transformation Officer Ben Kirshner to state economic development leadership: "I can’t remember a day where Brian hasn’t called me multiple times regarding the data center site we’ve been working on together for several months," describing arranging a meeting with PECO leadership in the Governor’s Philadelphia office and "helping Brian secure at least a term sheet so that he can lock in Digital Realty" Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (RTK release)
  • 2025-08-04900 Conshohocken Road listed by Binswanger commercial broker
  • 2025-09-04O’Neill emails Chief Transformation Officer Ben Kirshner seeking "fast track treatment from DEP" for the Cleveland-Cliffs site and describes building "an 800 megawatt power plant" at a $1 billion additional cost; Kirshner replies at 4:37 p.m. the same day, "I just sent in the request to DEP" Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (RTK release)
  • 2025-09-19Plymouth Twp receives 1st 900 Conshohocken Rd ZHB application Plymouth Township
  • 2025-10-01Plymouth Twp Planning Agency votes 4-0 against O'Neill 900 Conshohocken Rd Plymouth Township
  • 2025-11-17O'Neill 900 Conshohocken Rd ZHB application withdrawn after Cleveland-Cliffs disputes standing
  • 2025-12-26O’Neill emails Michael Tierney, a lawyer then serving at the U.S. State Department, asking whether there is "any flexibility in that 25-ton number," the threshold at which a new source of VOCs or nitrogen oxides in the five southeastern counties becomes a major facility. He states emission reduction credits are unavailable in the region, asks whether the EPA can provide waivers, proposes a strategy "in partnership with the EPA," and describes the standards as put in during the "green movement." He presses for speed with a transaction he values at ten to twenty billion dollars due to close in six days DeSmog
  • 2026-01-05Tierney forwards the request to Matthew Wurst, chief of staff to the chairman of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, thanking him for arranging a meeting DeSmog
  • 2026-01-07The commission and MLP Ventures meet by video call, twelve days after the original request. The Shapiro administration says Tierney never disclosed his federal employment in its conversations with him DeSmog
  • 2026-02-02Plymouth Twp moratorium 2nd Change.org petition launched Change.org
  • 2026-05-01O'Neill refiles 900 Conshohocken Rd ZHB application Plymouth Township
  • 2026-05-05Inquirer Plymouth Twp follow-up coverage Plymouth Township
  • 2026-05-28Plymouth Twp announces 900 Conshohocken ZHB hearing for June 25 2026 at Colonial Middle School MoreThanTheCurve
  • 2026-06-09Council authorizes solicitor to oppose 900 Conshohocken application at ZHB Patch
  • 2026-06-25900 Conshohocken ZHB hearing opens: party-status requests + initial testimony (no public comment this date) MoreThanTheCurve
  • 2026-06-25First ZHB hearing: party status granted to the township, the Borough of Conshohocken Authority, and 12 residents; no testimony taken; continued to July 28 with a July 30 session likely MoreThanTheCurve
  • 2026-07-14Hearing continued from July 28 to August 6 at the request of parties, "to allow additional time for participation by the parties"; the board meets July 28 only to vote the continuance, and testimony begins August 6 at 7 PM at Colonial Middle School Plymouth Township
  • 2026-07-15After a resident petition, borough council directs its solicitor (Michael Peters, Eastburn & Gray) to prepare a request for party status before the Plymouth ZHB; the authorizing vote is set for August 5, the night before testimony begins Borough of Conshohocken
  • 2026-07-21Substantive validity challenge filed against the Plymouth Township zoning ordinance, with a relief clause seeking exemption from noise limits and "any and all other zoning relief necessary," without limitation Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (RTK release)
  • 2026-07-21Developer files substantive validity challenge to the zoning ordinance, in the alternative to the pending special exception MoreThanTheCurve
  • 2026-07-27Council publicly discloses that it presented the applicant 43 health and safety conditions, that the applicant rejected them, and that the applicant has filed a challenge to the validity of the township zoning ordinance; council states it will continue to oppose the special exception and any ordinance challenge Plymouth Township
  • 2026-07-27Applicant files a second application challenging the validity of the Plymouth Township zoning ordinance (substantive validity challenge), disclosed publicly by council the same day Patch
  • 2026-07-27Council reveals it presented the applicant a 43-point list of health and safety conditions, including a 500-foot separation for mechanical equipment, a 100-foot planted buffer, octave-band noise limits down to 16 hertz, closed-loop cooling with no Schuylkill River withdrawal or discharge, a decommissioning bond, and a public monitoring portal; the conditions were offered as a memorandum of understanding rather than an ordinance, and the applicant declined to sign Patch
  • 2026-07-27Validity challenge application deemed complete, starting the 60-day clock to open hearings by Sept 25 PHL17 (WPHL)
  • 2026-07-27Council states the developer walked back agreed conditions from its 43-point list and says it will not entertain theatrics Plymouth Township Council
  • 2026-07-30Preliminary Environmental Noise Assessment dated July 30 but not circulated to the public until after the August 6 hearing adjourned. Its passing scenario depends on sound attenuation products for the project’s 227 chillers that do not currently exist; it models six generators on a tract across Conshohocken Road (Tract 2) that no application before the board covers, feeding a microgrid of undisclosed megawatts; it is silent on three of the four neighboring municipalities; and it concedes that conditions at the site cannot be reproduced for future measurement Auxia Design
  • 2026-07-31The Governor's official account responds to the validity challenge: "This is the exact wrong way to do development here in Pennsylvania. I'm a hell no." The statement follows more than two years in which the Governor's Office of Transformation and Opportunity worked with the developer on the site Office of the Governor of Pennsylvania
  • 2026-08-04Applicant releases 4ward Planning economic impact study claiming $424M in local tax revenue over 20 years MoreThanTheCurve
  • 2026-08-06Hearing resumes before a 750-seat auditorium filled nearly to capacity. Party status granted to the Borough of Conshohocken, five nearby residents, and a Whitemarsh man citing family medical conditions; Norristown is refused on the reasoning that its concern is general rather than specific. Opposing attorneys challenge the adequacy of the application and the qualifications of the applicant’s witness, Richard Roseberry of Colliers Engineering and Design; the board denies the motions. No testimony is completed and the matter is continued to August 17 for scheduling only MoreThanTheCurve
  • 2026-08-06The developer tells reporters he has agreed to about 90 percent of the township’s demands, attributes opposition to bad information from bad actors, and says of the validity challenge that if the township does not work with him in good faith he intends to get it by right Philadelphia Inquirer
  • 2026-08-06Hearing resumes before a nearly full auditorium, Borough of Conshohocken and six individuals granted party status, Norristown denied MoreThanTheCurve
  • 2026-08-06Applicant's planner Richard Roseberry of Colliers qualified as an expert over objections; motions on the adequacy of the application denied; session ends before his testimony concludes and before cross-examination WHYY
  • 2026-08-07Township launches a Data Center Information webpage as the central source for the proceeding Plymouth Township
  • 2026-08-17Scheduling session, no testimony that night, September testimony dates expected MoreThanTheCurve
  • 2026-08-17Board votes to continue to Sept 17 and to relocate the evidentiary hearings to the Karen B. Weiss Meeting Room MoreThanTheCurve
Legal record

Filings and legal actions

  • 2025-09-19
    ZHB application Plymouth Twp ZHB · (local)

    O'Neill ZHB application; Cleveland-Cliffs disputed standing.

    900 Conshohocken Rd LLC · Withdrawn Nov 17 2025; refiled May 1 2026
  • 2026-05-01
    ZHB application (refiled) Plymouth Twp ZHB · (local)

    Second special-exception application; quasi-judicial hearing scheduled to span multiple dates beginning June 25 2026.

    900 Conshohocken Rd LLC · Hearing set June 25 2026
  • 2026-07
    Substantive validity challenge Plymouth Township / MPC Section 916.1 · n/a

    A second application challenging the validity of the Plymouth Township zoning ordinance itself, disclosed publicly by Township Council on July 27, 2026. Under MPC Section 1006-A a successful challenge can result in a court ordering the described development approved, with no deference owed to the Zoning Hearing Board or Council. Council called it 'a blatant attempt by the Applicant to demand approval by tantrum' and said it will oppose the challenge. The filing has not been published; residents have asked for the filing date, venue and grounds asserted.

    900 Conshohocken Road LLC (J. Brian O'Neill) v. Plymouth Township · Pending
  • 2025-11-17
    Standing dispute / withdrawal Plymouth Township Zoning Hearing Board · n/a

    The first special exception application collapsed at the November 17, 2025 hearing when counsel for property owner Cleveland-Cliffs disputed the applicant’s standing, stating the sale agreement was unsigned. The application was withdrawn and refiled the following spring, dated April 19, 2026.

    Cleveland-Cliffs (counsel Heather Fine) vs. applicant · Withdrawn
  • 2026-04
    RTK request Pennsylvania Office of Open Records / Governor’s Office · n/a

    Right to Know request that produced emails between O'Neill and the Shapiro administration, including a proposal that opponents appealing a data center be required to post a bond worth double the value of the project, which would functionally price out neighborhood appeals.

    Concerned Citizens of Montour County · Disclosed
  • 2026-07-21
    Substantive validity challenge (detail) Plymouth Township Zoning Hearing Board / MPC Section 916.1 · n/a

    The petition asserts the township ordinance is unconstitutional as applied to data centers and seeks exemption from the noise limits along with "any and all other zoning relief necessary," without limitation. MoreThanTheCurve has filed a Right to Know request to obtain the document, which had not been published as of July 28.

    900 Conshohocken Road LLC v. Plymouth Township · Pending
  • 2026-07-30
    Expert report (preliminary) Plymouth Township Zoning Hearing Board · n/a

    Preliminary Environmental Noise Assessment. Preliminary by its own title and provisional in its data. The passing scenario relies on sound attenuation products for 227 chillers that do not currently exist. Six generators are modeled on Tract 2 across Conshohocken Road, which no application before the board covers, feeding a microgrid of undisclosed total megawatts. Three of the four neighboring municipalities are absent from the analysis, and the report concedes that site conditions cannot be reproduced for future measurement.

    Auxia Design for MLP Ventures LLC · Circulated after the August 6 hearing
News

Coverage of this project

Sources

Know your rights

In Pennsylvania, a data center on industrial land usually needs a special exception or conditional use, decided by a local Zoning Hearing Board after a public, quasi-judicial hearing. Neighbors can request party status, cross-examine witnesses, and build an evidentiary record. Municipalities can also write data-center ordinances with enforceable standards.

Know your rights →

Take action

Organized community opposition is the single most effective check on these projects in Pennsylvania. Show up to hearings, submit comment when it is taken, support legal and expert-witness costs, and ask your municipality for a moratorium and a real ordinance.

Ways to help →