Environmental justice and site legacy
HighConnaughtown neighborhood adjacency; predominantly working-class residential.
Plymouth TownshipPlymouth Township, Montgomery County
J. Brian O'Neill's two-million-square-foot AI data center on the former Cleveland-Cliffs steel mill, roughly 200 feet from homes, opposed by residents with party status, Plymouth Township Council, Conshohocken Borough, and regional environmental groups.
Mill idled May 2025; closed June 30 2025 (110 jobs). 1st ZHB app Sept 19 2025; Planning Agency 4-0 against Oct 1 2025; withdrawn Nov 17 2025 (standing defect). Refiled May 1 2026; hearing set June 25 2026; Council opposed June 9 2026. First hearing held June 25 2026: party status granted to the township, the Borough of Conshohocken Authority, and 12 residents; no testimony taken; continued to July 28 with July 30 likely. Township announced July 14 2026 that the hearing is continued from July 28 to August 6 at the parties' request for additional preparation time. Conshohocken Borough Council directed its solicitor July 15 2026 to prepare a party-status request, with the authorizing vote set for August 5. July 27 2026: council publicly disclosed 43 proposed safeguards, the applicant's rejection of all of them, and the applicant's filing challenging the validity of the zoning ordinance. July 27 2026: council disclosed 43 proposed conditions offered as a memorandum of understanding, the applicant's rejection of all of them, and his substantive validity challenge to the zoning ordinance. August 6 2026: hearing resumed to a near-capacity auditorium; party status granted to the Borough of Conshohocken and six individuals, Norristown refused; opposing motions denied; continued to August 17 for scheduling only. UPDATE (2026-08-24): On July 21 the applicant filed a substantive validity challenge arguing the zoning ordinance fails to provide for data centers, running it in the alternative to the pending special exception in what land-use counsel describe as a dual-track strategy. The township deemed that application complete on July 27, which requires hearings on it to begin by September 25. On July 27 the Township Council said publicly that the applicant walked back conditions from a 43-point list the council had presented, with Council President Lynne Viscio saying the township would not be bullied or intimidated; the developer told reporters he had accepted most of the conditions. At the August 6 session the applicant's planner testified that data centers share the characteristics of manufacturing, research and development, and warehousing, all listed uses, and counsel Edmund Campbell argued that a project similar in character to a listed use is entitled to that use. On August 17 the board voted to continue the matter to September 17 at 7:00 p.m. and to move the evidentiary hearings from the 750-seat Colonial Middle School auditorium to the Karen B. Weiss Meeting Room, which seats roughly 200, with livestream and an overflow viewing room at the Greater Plymouth Community Center. UPDATE (2026-09-10): The applicant's first witness on August 6 was Richard Roseberry, a senior principal at Colliers Engineering and Design, whose qualification as an expert was challenged by counsel for several parties and accepted by the board. Motions challenging the adequacy of the application were denied. The session ran nearly two and a half hours and ended before his direct testimony was complete, so no party has yet cross-examined him. O'Neill did not attend, and told the Inquirer afterward that if the township does not work with him in good faith he intends to get the use by right, which is the validity challenge stated plainly. The petition against the project passed 4,000 signatures in early August. On August 7 the township launched a Data Center Information page collecting livestreams, statements, and filings. As of September 10 the township has posted no date for the validity challenge hearing, which must open by September 25.
Connaughtown neighborhood adjacency; predominantly working-class residential.
Plymouth Township55-85 dB projected from cooling/generators in residential area.
Plymouth TownshipBackup diesel generators near residential and Schuylkill River.
Plymouth TownshipO'Neill's own figures: a 'GW' data center pegged at $35.16B; phase 1 pitched as $44M taxes + $30M+ to the school district, opponents counter with ratepayer/grid risk.
North Penn NowThe application discloses gas turbines located within and between the buildings but has never disclosed total megawatts, turbine count, annual operating hours, or property-line limits for nitrogen oxides or fine particulates. Council's 43 conditions require Tier 4 standards for generators, a federal standard for compression-ignition engines that does not reach combustion turbines.
Plymouth TownshipCouncil proposed octave-band limits at the property line of 65 dB at 16 hertz, 60 dB at 31.5 hertz, 55 dB at 63 hertz and 50 dB at 125 hertz, the low-frequency range that carries furthest and disturbs sleep. Plymouth Township has no comparable low-frequency cap in its existing ordinance, and the applicant rejected the proposed conditions.
PatchCouncil asked that the project be power self-sufficient through on-site generation and not draw from public utilities, which locks in an on-site power plant next to homes. Every additional gigawatt of Pennsylvania data center load raises the PJM capacity price that all ratepayers already pay.
PatchRight to Know records show the developer told the Governor’s office on September 4, 2025 that the plan includes "an 800 megawatt power plant" at a $1 billion additional cost, a figure never disclosed in the zoning application or in testimony. An 800 MW gas plant is in the class of large stations that anchor regions of the grid, proposed roughly 200 feet from homes.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (RTK release)The applicant’s own Preliminary Environmental Noise Assessment finds the project’s 227 chillers within acceptable limits only in a scenario that depends on sound attenuation products which do not currently exist for this equipment. The same report concedes that site conditions cannot be reproduced, meaning the ordinance limit could not be verified by measurement after the fact.
Auxia DesignThe assessment models six generators on a tract across Conshohocken Road that no application before the zoning hearing board covers, feeding a microgrid whose total megawatts appear nowhere in the document.
Auxia DesignRight to Know records show the developer asked a federal official in December 2025 about "flexibility" in the 25-ton per year threshold at which a new source of VOCs or nitrogen oxides in Montgomery County becomes a major facility subject to the lowest achievable emission rate and offsetting reductions. Five months later he told Upper Merion residents that the claim data centers reduce air quality was a myth.
DeSmogSchuylkill well water source; Delaware Riverkeeper flagged §27 environmental rights.
Plymouth TownshipGMU Schar/Clower-Waters Nov 2025 study shows mixed effects.
Construction traffic; ~370-1,200 signatures across 3 petitions.
Plymouth TownshipCouncil asked for a closed-loop, non-toxic cooling system with no withdrawal from the Schuylkill River or any public water system and no discharge to the river, plus annual water consumption reporting. The applicant rejected the condition package; makeup water volumes remain undisclosed.
PatchCouncil sought an emergency response plan reviewed by the fire department before permits, first-responder training at the applicant’s expense, NFPA 855 compliance for battery storage, and in-building radio coverage for emergency responders. The applicant declined the package.
PatchThe site is a former Cleveland-Cliffs steel plate mill on the Schuylkill River, roughly 200 feet from homes in the Connaughtown area, with legacy industrial contamination and a decommissioning bond among the conditions the applicant rejected.
PatchIn seeking expedited state environmental review, the developer described the former steel plate mill as "a former plating operation" and told the Governor’s office "We believe the site to be clean environmentally," while asking for fast track treatment from DEP on a short as-is closing window.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (RTK release)The noise assessment is silent on three of the four neighboring municipalities, and the board separately refused Norristown party status on the reasoning that its concern was general rather than specific, leaving thousands of nearby households outside both the analysis and the proceeding.
MoreThanTheCurve<50 permanent jobs vs 110 steel jobs lost June 30 2025.
Cleveland-CliffsTactics: Party status at the Zoning Hearing Board for twelve residents; written demands for advance expert disclosure under MPC Section 908(4); packed hearings at Colonial Middle School; petition drive; community legal fund; statewide project tracker; sustained local and regional press engagement
Residents of Plymouth Township, Conshohocken and the surrounding area. Twelve residents hold party status alongside the Township Solicitor and the Borough of Conshohocken Authority, and Conshohocken Borough Council directed its solicitor on July 15, 2026 to seek party status as well, with the authorizing vote set for August 5. State Rep. Gregory Scott wrote the board's solicitor on June 29 urging use of the board's authority under MPC Section 908(4) to compel production of witnesses and documents.
O'Neill ZHB application; Cleveland-Cliffs disputed standing.
900 Conshohocken Rd LLC · Withdrawn Nov 17 2025; refiled May 1 2026Second special-exception application; quasi-judicial hearing scheduled to span multiple dates beginning June 25 2026.
900 Conshohocken Rd LLC · Hearing set June 25 2026A second application challenging the validity of the Plymouth Township zoning ordinance itself, disclosed publicly by Township Council on July 27, 2026. Under MPC Section 1006-A a successful challenge can result in a court ordering the described development approved, with no deference owed to the Zoning Hearing Board or Council. Council called it 'a blatant attempt by the Applicant to demand approval by tantrum' and said it will oppose the challenge. The filing has not been published; residents have asked for the filing date, venue and grounds asserted.
900 Conshohocken Road LLC (J. Brian O'Neill) v. Plymouth Township · PendingThe first special exception application collapsed at the November 17, 2025 hearing when counsel for property owner Cleveland-Cliffs disputed the applicant’s standing, stating the sale agreement was unsigned. The application was withdrawn and refiled the following spring, dated April 19, 2026.
Cleveland-Cliffs (counsel Heather Fine) vs. applicant · WithdrawnRight to Know request that produced emails between O'Neill and the Shapiro administration, including a proposal that opponents appealing a data center be required to post a bond worth double the value of the project, which would functionally price out neighborhood appeals.
Concerned Citizens of Montour County · DisclosedThe petition asserts the township ordinance is unconstitutional as applied to data centers and seeks exemption from the noise limits along with "any and all other zoning relief necessary," without limitation. MoreThanTheCurve has filed a Right to Know request to obtain the document, which had not been published as of July 28.
900 Conshohocken Road LLC v. Plymouth Township · PendingPreliminary Environmental Noise Assessment. Preliminary by its own title and provisional in its data. The passing scenario relies on sound attenuation products for 227 chillers that do not currently exist. Six generators are modeled on Tract 2 across Conshohocken Road, which no application before the board covers, feeding a microgrid of undisclosed total megawatts. Three of the four neighboring municipalities are absent from the analysis, and the report concedes that site conditions cannot be reproduced for future measurement.
Auxia Design for MLP Ventures LLC · Circulated after the August 6 hearingIn Pennsylvania, a data center on industrial land usually needs a special exception or conditional use, decided by a local Zoning Hearing Board after a public, quasi-judicial hearing. Neighbors can request party status, cross-examine witnesses, and build an evidentiary record. Municipalities can also write data-center ordinances with enforceable standards.
Know your rights →Organized community opposition is the single most effective check on these projects in Pennsylvania. Show up to hearings, submit comment when it is taken, support legal and expert-witness costs, and ask your municipality for a moratorium and a real ordinance.
Ways to help →