Williamsburg
Blair County · 774 Juniata River Rd, Williamsburg, PA 16693
A coal plant that retired in 1990 with 43.3 MW of capacity, on a 37.93-acre parcel in Blair County. The PATER study evaluates it for new large load.
The site by the numbers
What the report says about this site
“Located at 774 Juniata River Rd, Williamsburg, PA 16693 (coordinates 40°28'13.7"N 78°12'27.8"W), this former coal plant retired in 1990 and has a retired capacity of 43.3 MW (see Figure 37 and Table 26). The site is owned by the Williamsburg Borough and needs to be cleared for development aside from a substation. The 37.9-acre site is located north of Williamsburg, which is just off US-22. It and an adjacent 4.3-acre site is not zoned and rated as moderately rugged. It is treated as a presumptive brownfield with confirmed soil contamination and groundwater contamination TBD. FEMA designates the site as having a very low natural hazard risk but in a floodway. The parcel and nearby parcels are not located within or adjacent to a documented coal mining area and are, therefore, considered to have minimal mine subsidence potential. Access to the rail system is ~8 miles away; major roads are ~2.5 miles away, and river access is ~6 miles away. The nearest transmission lines are ~2.5 miles away, and the nearest substation is ~6 miles away. The nearest natural gas lines are ~10 miles away. The nearest broadband installation is adjacent to the site. The nearest generator is ~20 miles away. The site is ~10 miles away from the Marcellus shale formation. The nearest wastewater treatment plant is ~1 mile away, and the nearest brownfield is ~12 miles away. There are ~347,184 people within 30 miles of the site.”
PATER Part A report, section 4.21, page 55
Site attributes
- Report name
- Williamsburg
- Address
- 774 Juniata River Rd, Williamsburg, PA 16693
- Coordinates
- 40°28'13.7"N 78°12'27.8"W
- Fuel
- Bituminous Coal
- Zoning
- None Listed
- Ruggedness
- 4 = Moderately rugged
- Brownfield designation
- Presumptive
- On-site contamination
- Confirmed
- Groundwater contamination
- TBD
- FEMA natural hazards risk
- Very low
- FEMA flood hazard
- Floodway
- Population within 30 miles
- About 347,184 (report estimate)
- PJM transmission zone
- PENELEC
- Evaluated for
- New large load
Distance to infrastructure
| Distance to | Miles |
|---|---|
| Major road | 2.39 |
| Rail network | 7.99 |
| Major river | 6.11 |
| Transmission line | 2.31 |
| Substation | 6.22 |
| Natural gas pipeline | 10.21 |
| Broadband | 0.18 |
| Marcellus Shale formation | 10.08 |
| Wastewater treatment facility | 0.80 |
| Brownfield site | 12.19 |
What the report evaluated this site for
The report places sites in the PENELEC transmission zone in its large-load category, because expected generation additions there exceed projected load growth (pages 76 and 79).
The acreage-based generation estimates in Table 28 cover only the sites in zones evaluated for generation, so this site does not appear there.
Where this site stands
- Current status
- Part A candidate. Part B will narrow the 21 sites to 5 to 7 priorities.
- Next step
- Part B will rank the sites and validate the top 5 to 7 through site visits (page 103).
- Public comment
- Written comments on Part A are accepted under PUC Docket No. M-2026-3059601 through October 14, 2026.
- Review meetings
- The report says PATER Study Review Meetings are planned for October and February (page 103).
All 21 candidate sites
- Barbadoes Island2.7 mi
- Venice Island (JSC)5.7 mi
- Cromby12.1 mi
- Martins Creek Harwood69.5 mi
- West Shore86.3 mi
- Jenkins86.6 mi
- Stanton92.5 mi
- Lock Haven133.6 mi
- Milesburg142.6 mi
- Williamsburg154.6 mi
- Cambria Cogeneration180.4 mi
- Armstrong Power Station225.6 mi
- Piney Creek229.0 mi
- Elrama Power Plant243.1 mi
- Hatfield's Ferry244.6 mi
- Mitchell Power Station245.8 mi
- F R Phillips260.8 mi
- Wayne264.5 mi
- AES Beaver Valley268.1 mi
- North East Cogeneration277.1 mi
- Erie Mill284.4 mi
Our view on the study
Pennsylvania is studying two Schuylkill power sites. We think residents deserve corrected data, real environmental analysis and a straight answer on costs before the list gets shorter.
Read our view →Take action
File a comment by October 14, watch the October 7 review meeting, and come to the Zoning Hearing Board on Thursday, October 15 at 7:00 p.m.
Ways to help →