Wayne
Crawford County · 3590 Franklin Pike, Cochranton, PA 16314
A fuel oil peaker plant that retired in 2004 with 53 MW of capacity, on a 53.02-acre parcel in Crawford County. The PATER study evaluates it for new large load.
The site by the numbers
What the report says about this site
“Located at 3590 Franklin Pike, Cochranton, PA 16314 (coordinates 41°30'53.1"N 80°00'37.1"W), this former fuel oil peaker plant retired in 2004 and has a retired capacity of 53 MW (see Figure 35 and Table 24). Since retirement, the site has been cleared while keeping a substation on the property. The 53-acre site is located near the intersection of State Highway 173 and US-322. The site is decommissioned, but its remediation status is unknown. It and 0.8 acres of adjacent land are not zoned and rated as slightly rugged. The site is not classified as a presumptive brownfield, and there is no known soil or groundwater contamination. FEMA designates the site as having a relatively moderate natural hazard risk and minimal flooding risk. The parcel and nearby parcels are designated as having possible mine subsidence potential, as they are located within or adjacent to a known coal mining area; however, no publicly accessible PA DEP records were identified to confirm that mining activities occurred on the site. Rail and water access all fall within 2 miles of the site; a major roadway is within 1 mile. Transmission lines and a substation are accessible on site; a natural gas line runs ~2 miles away. The nearest broadband installation is ~3.5 miles away. The closest generator is ~19 miles away. The site sits on the Marcellus shale formation. The nearest wastewater treatment plant is ~4 miles away, and the nearest brownfield is ~16 miles away. There are ~236,732 people within 30 miles of the site.”
PATER Part A report, section 4.19, page 53
Site attributes
- Report name
- Wayne (PA)
- Address
- 3590 Franklin Pike, Cochranton, PA 16314
- Coordinates
- 41°30'53.1"N 80°00'37.1"W
- Fuel
- Distillate Fuel Oil
- Zoning
- Special
- Ruggedness
- 2 = Slightly rugged
- Brownfield designation
- Not Presumptive
- On-site contamination
- None known
- Groundwater contamination
- None known
- FEMA natural hazards risk
- Relatively moderate
- FEMA flood hazard
- Minimal
- Population within 30 miles
- About 236,732 (report estimate)
- PJM transmission zone
- PENELEC
- Evaluated for
- New large load
Distance to infrastructure
| Distance to | Miles |
|---|---|
| Major road | 0.78 |
| Rail network | 1.58 |
| Major river | 1.74 |
| Transmission line | 0.00 |
| Substation | 0.09 |
| Natural gas pipeline | 2.23 |
| Broadband | 3.55 |
| Marcellus Shale formation | 0.00 |
| Wastewater treatment facility | 3.67 |
| Brownfield site | 15.73 |
What the report evaluated this site for
The report places sites in the PENELEC transmission zone in its large-load category, because expected generation additions there exceed projected load growth (pages 76 and 79).
The acreage-based generation estimates in Table 28 cover only the sites in zones evaluated for generation, so this site does not appear there.
Where this site stands
- Current status
- Part A candidate. Part B will narrow the 21 sites to 5 to 7 priorities.
- Next step
- Part B will rank the sites and validate the top 5 to 7 through site visits (page 103).
- Public comment
- Written comments on Part A are accepted under PUC Docket No. M-2026-3059601 through October 14, 2026.
- Review meetings
- The report says PATER Study Review Meetings are planned for October and February (page 103).
All 21 candidate sites
- Barbadoes Island2.7 mi
- Venice Island (JSC)5.7 mi
- Cromby12.1 mi
- Martins Creek Harwood69.5 mi
- West Shore86.3 mi
- Jenkins86.6 mi
- Stanton92.5 mi
- Lock Haven133.6 mi
- Milesburg142.6 mi
- Williamsburg154.6 mi
- Cambria Cogeneration180.4 mi
- Armstrong Power Station225.6 mi
- Piney Creek229.0 mi
- Elrama Power Plant243.1 mi
- Hatfield's Ferry244.6 mi
- Mitchell Power Station245.8 mi
- F R Phillips260.8 mi
- Wayne264.5 mi
- AES Beaver Valley268.1 mi
- North East Cogeneration277.1 mi
- Erie Mill284.4 mi
Our view on the study
Pennsylvania is studying two Schuylkill power sites. We think residents deserve corrected data, real environmental analysis and a straight answer on costs before the list gets shorter.
Read our view →Take action
File a comment by October 14, watch the October 7 review meeting, and come to the Zoning Hearing Board on Thursday, October 15 at 7:00 p.m.
Ways to help →