PATER site tracker
Part A candidate

Mitchell Power Station

Washington County · 50 Electric Way, New Eagle, PA 15067

A coal plant that retired in 2013 with 448.6 MW of capacity, on a 26.63-acre parcel in Washington County. The PATER study evaluates it for new generation or large load.

APS zoneEvaluated for new generation or large loadBituminous CoalRetired 2013
At a glance

The site by the numbers

Retired capacity448.6 MW
Retired in2013
Parcel26.63 acres
Adjacent land278.74 acres
Within 30 miles1.87 million
From 900 Conshohocken Rd245.8 miles
Section 4.15

What the report says about this site

“Located at 50 Electric Way, New Eagle, PA 15067 (coordinates 40°13'16.6"N 79°58'07.9"W), this former coal plant by Courtney, PA, on the banks of the Monongahela River retired in 2013 and has a retired capacity of 448.6 MW (see Figure 31 and Table 20). The land is partially cleared, but some of the plant structures remain on the site. The 26.6-acre site is located north of the intersection between Interstate 70 and State Highway 43. Decommissioning has not started, and its remediation has not yet begun. It and 278.7 acres of nearby undeveloped land under common ownership are zoned for industrial use and rated as moderately rugged land. According to the PA DCED decommissioning and redevelopment playbook, the broader Mitchell Power Station and adjacent Canestrale properties comprise ~856 acres in cohesive ownership available for redevelopment (PA DCED, 2018). The site is treated as a presumptive brownfield with confirmed contaminated soil and contaminated groundwater. FEMA designates the site as having a very low natural hazard risk but sitting in a floodway. The parcel is not located within or adjacent to a documented coal mining area and is, therefore, considered to have minimal mine subsidence potential; however, nearby parcels fall within a documented mineable coal area with confirmed underground mining activity and are, therefore, considered to have elevated mine subsidence risk. Rail access, major roads, and water access are all easily accessible from the site. The site has access to transmission lines and a substation, and a natural gas pipeline runs ~0.5 miles away. The nearest broadband installation is ~1.5 miles away. The nearest generator is ~14.5 miles away. The site sits on the Marcellus shale formation. The nearest wastewater treatment plant is ~1.5 miles away, and the nearest brownfield is 3.5 miles away. There are ~1,869,316 people within 30 miles of the site.”

PATER Part A report, section 4.15, page 49
Table 20

Site attributes

Report name
Mitchell Power Station
Address
50 Electric Way, New Eagle, PA 15067
Coordinates
40°13'16.6"N 79°58'07.9"W
Fuel
Bituminous Coal
Zoning
Industrial
Ruggedness
4 = Moderately rugged
Brownfield designation
Presumptive
On-site contamination
Confirmed
Groundwater contamination
Confirmed
FEMA natural hazards risk
Very low
FEMA flood hazard
Floodway
Population within 30 miles
About 1,869,316 (report estimate)
PJM transmission zone
APS
Evaluated for
New generation or large load
Table 20

Distance to infrastructure

Approximate distance in miles, as published in Table 20 (page 49). The report says distances are measured from a point on the site and “all distance measurements must be considered general.”
Distance toMiles
Major road0.18
Rail network0.04
Major river0.22
Transmission line0.00
Substation0.03
Natural gas pipeline0.47
Broadband1.26
Marcellus Shale formation0.00
Wastewater treatment facility1.38
Brownfield site3.36
Table 28

The report’s acreage-based capacity estimates

Installed capacity potential in megawatts, from Table 28 (pages 78 and 79). The report calls these estimates “approximate as they are based on parcel acreage (which may differ from developable land acreage) and single land use intensity values per technology.” The gas figure is the acreage divided by 0.2 acres per megawatt (Table 27). Extended acreage adds adjacent parcels with the same owner.
TechnologyParcel (29 acres)Extended (163 acres)
Natural gas143814
Conventional nuclear48271
Battery storage4082,327
Solar423

The report evaluated sites in the APS transmission zone for both new generation and new large loads, because the difference between expected load and generation there was marginal (page 79).

Status

Where this site stands

Current status
Part A candidate. Part B will narrow the 21 sites to 5 to 7 priorities.
Next step
Part B will rank the sites and validate the top 5 to 7 through site visits (page 103).
Public comment
Written comments on Part A are accepted under PUC Docket No. M-2026-3059601 through October 14, 2026.
Review meetings
The report says PATER Study Review Meetings are planned for October and February (page 103).

Our view on the study

Pennsylvania is studying two Schuylkill power sites. We think residents deserve corrected data, real environmental analysis and a straight answer on costs before the list gets shorter.

Read our view →

Take action

File a comment by October 14, watch the October 7 review meeting, and come to the Zoning Hearing Board on Thursday, October 15 at 7:00 p.m.

Ways to help →