Martins Creek Harwood
Luzerne County · No street address in the report
A fuel oil peaker plant that retired in 2022 with 32 MW of capacity, on a 26.95-acre parcel in Luzerne County. The PATER study evaluates it for new generation.
The site by the numbers
What the report says about this site
“Located at no specific address but at coordinates 40°56'07.0"N 76°01'42.4"W, this former fuel oil peaker plant located southwest of Hazelton, PA, retired in 2022 and has a retired capacity of 32 MW (see Figure 29 and Table 18). The cleared land looks to have been purchased by a private company and is being used by a truck and repair service, but the adjacent parcel contains a PPL substation and has available land. The site has been decommissioned, but its remediation status is unknown. The 27-acre site is located along Interstate 81. It and 12.7 adjacent acres are zoned for commercial activity and rated as intermediately rugged. The site is not classified as a potential brownfield, and there is no known soil or groundwater contamination. FEMA designates the site as having a relatively low natural hazard risk and minimal flooding risk. The parcel and nearby parcels are located within or adjacent to a confirmed underground mining area and are, therefore, considered to have elevated mine subsidence potential. Rail access is ~1 mile away; it sits by a major road, and it is ~11 miles from river access. Transmission lines, a substation, and a natural gas pipeline are all within 1 mile of the site. The nearest broadband installation is ~10 miles away. The nearest generator is ~1 mile away. The site sits on the Marcellus shale formation. The nearest wastewater treatment plant is ~2.5 miles away, and the nearest brownfield is ~2 miles away. There are ~678,147 people within 30 miles of the site.”
PATER Part A report, section 4.13, page 47
Site attributes
- Report name
- Martins Creek LLC Harwood (PA)
- Address
- No street address in the report
- Coordinates
- 40°56'07.0"N 76°01'42.4"W
- Fuel
- Distillate Fuel Oil
- Zoning
- Commercial
- Ruggedness
- 3 = Intermediately rugged
- Brownfield designation
- Not Presumptive
- On-site contamination
- None known
- Groundwater contamination
- None known
- FEMA natural hazards risk
- Relatively low
- FEMA flood hazard
- Minimal
- Population within 30 miles
- About 678,147 (report estimate)
- PJM transmission zone
- PPL
- Evaluated for
- New generation
Distance to infrastructure
| Distance to | Miles |
|---|---|
| Major road | 0.23 |
| Rail network | 1.15 |
| Major river | 11.09 |
| Transmission line | 0.00 |
| Substation | 0.12 |
| Natural gas pipeline | 0.87 |
| Broadband | 10.00 |
| Marcellus Shale formation | 0.00 |
| Wastewater treatment facility | 2.46 |
| Brownfield site | 1.86 |
The report’s acreage-based capacity estimates
| Technology | Parcel (27 acres) | Extended (40 acres) |
|---|---|---|
| Natural gas | 135 | 198 |
| Conventional nuclear | 45 | 66 |
| Battery storage | 385 | 566 |
| Solar | 4 | 6 |
The report places sites in the PPL transmission zone in its generation category, because projected load growth there exceeds expected generation additions (pages 76 and 77).
Where this site stands
- Current status
- Part A candidate. Part B will narrow the 21 sites to 5 to 7 priorities.
- Next step
- Part B will rank the sites and validate the top 5 to 7 through site visits (page 103).
- Public comment
- Written comments on Part A are accepted under PUC Docket No. M-2026-3059601 through October 14, 2026.
- Review meetings
- The report says PATER Study Review Meetings are planned for October and February (page 103).
All 21 candidate sites
- Barbadoes Island2.7 mi
- Venice Island (JSC)5.7 mi
- Cromby12.1 mi
- Martins Creek Harwood69.5 mi
- West Shore86.3 mi
- Jenkins86.6 mi
- Stanton92.5 mi
- Lock Haven133.6 mi
- Milesburg142.6 mi
- Williamsburg154.6 mi
- Cambria Cogeneration180.4 mi
- Armstrong Power Station225.6 mi
- Piney Creek229.0 mi
- Elrama Power Plant243.1 mi
- Hatfield's Ferry244.6 mi
- Mitchell Power Station245.8 mi
- F R Phillips260.8 mi
- Wayne264.5 mi
- AES Beaver Valley268.1 mi
- North East Cogeneration277.1 mi
- Erie Mill284.4 mi
Our view on the study
Pennsylvania is studying two Schuylkill power sites. We think residents deserve corrected data, real environmental analysis and a straight answer on costs before the list gets shorter.
Read our view →Take action
File a comment by October 14, watch the October 7 review meeting, and come to the Zoning Hearing Board on Thursday, October 15 at 7:00 p.m.
Ways to help →