Hatfield's Ferry
Greene County · 2907 E Roy Furman Hwy, Carmichaels, PA 15320
A coal plant that retired in 2013 with 1,728 MW of capacity, on a 176-acre parcel in Greene County. The PATER study evaluates it for new generation or large load.
The site by the numbers
What the report says about this site
“Located at 2907 E Roy Furman Hwy, Carmichaels, PA 15320 (coordinates 39°51'20.4"N 79°55'39.5"W), this former coal plant near the Monongahela River retired in 2013 and has a retired capacity of 1728 MW (see Figure 25 and Table 14). The prior buildings have been demolished leaving the site empty; there are no current plans for redevelopment. The site has been decommissioned, and remediation is in planning stages. The 176-acre site is across the river from Masontown. It and 96.1 acres of adjacent land are not zoned and are rated as moderately rugged. The site is treated as a presumptive brownfield, and there is confirmed soil and groundwater contamination. FEMA designates the site as having a relatively low natural hazard risk but having a 0.2% chance of annual flooding. The parcel and nearby parcels are located within or adjacent to a confirmed underground mining area and are, therefore, considered to have elevated mine subsidence potential. The site has adjacent access to major roads, the rail system, and the river. Transmission lines, a substation, and natural gas pipeline all run by the site. Broadband is installed ~2.5 miles away. The nearest generator is ~0.5 miles away. The site is located on the Marcellus shale formation. The nearest wastewater treatment plant is adjacent to the site, but the nearest brownfield is ~14 miles away. There are ~353,425 people within 30 miles of the site.”
PATER Part A report, section 4.9, page 43
Site attributes
- Report name
- Hatfield's Ferry Power Station
- Address
- 2907 E Roy Furman Hwy, Carmichaels, PA 15320
- Coordinates
- 39°51'20.4"N 79°55'39.5"W
- Fuel
- Bituminous Coal
- Zoning
- Special
- Ruggedness
- 4 = Moderately rugged
- Brownfield designation
- Presumptive
- On-site contamination
- Confirmed
- Groundwater contamination
- Confirmed
- FEMA natural hazards risk
- Relatively low
- FEMA flood hazard
- 0.2% Annual chance
- Population within 30 miles
- About 353,425 (report estimate)
- PJM transmission zone
- APS
- Evaluated for
- New generation or large load
Distance to infrastructure
| Distance to | Miles |
|---|---|
| Major road | 0.18 |
| Rail network | 0.24 |
| Major river | 0.16 |
| Transmission line | 0.00 |
| Substation | 0.35 |
| Natural gas pipeline | 0.10 |
| Broadband | 2.59 |
| Marcellus Shale formation | 0.00 |
| Wastewater treatment facility | 0.23 |
| Brownfield site | 14.10 |
The report’s acreage-based capacity estimates
| Technology | Parcel (176 acres) | Extended (240 acres) |
|---|---|---|
| Natural gas | 880 | 1,201 |
| Conventional nuclear | 293 | 400 |
| Battery storage | 2,514 | 3,433 |
| Solar | 25 | 34 |
The report evaluated sites in the APS transmission zone for both new generation and new large loads, because the difference between expected load and generation there was marginal (page 79).
Where this site stands
- Current status
- Part A candidate. Part B will narrow the 21 sites to 5 to 7 priorities.
- Next step
- Part B will rank the sites and validate the top 5 to 7 through site visits (page 103).
- Public comment
- Written comments on Part A are accepted under PUC Docket No. M-2026-3059601 through October 14, 2026.
- Review meetings
- The report says PATER Study Review Meetings are planned for October and February (page 103).
All 21 candidate sites
- Barbadoes Island2.7 mi
- Venice Island (JSC)5.7 mi
- Cromby12.1 mi
- Martins Creek Harwood69.5 mi
- West Shore86.3 mi
- Jenkins86.6 mi
- Stanton92.5 mi
- Lock Haven133.6 mi
- Milesburg142.6 mi
- Williamsburg154.6 mi
- Cambria Cogeneration180.4 mi
- Armstrong Power Station225.6 mi
- Piney Creek229.0 mi
- Elrama Power Plant243.1 mi
- Hatfield's Ferry244.6 mi
- Mitchell Power Station245.8 mi
- F R Phillips260.8 mi
- Wayne264.5 mi
- AES Beaver Valley268.1 mi
- North East Cogeneration277.1 mi
- Erie Mill284.4 mi
Our view on the study
Pennsylvania is studying two Schuylkill power sites. We think residents deserve corrected data, real environmental analysis and a straight answer on costs before the list gets shorter.
Read our view →Take action
File a comment by October 14, watch the October 7 review meeting, and come to the Zoning Hearing Board on Thursday, October 15 at 7:00 p.m.
Ways to help →