Cambria Cogeneration
Cambria County · 243 Rubisch Rd, Ebensburg, PA 15931
A waste coal plant that retired in 2019 with 98 MW of capacity, on a 46.33-acre parcel in Cambria County. The PATER study evaluates it for new large load.
The site by the numbers
What the report says about this site
“Located at 243 Rubisch Rd, Ebensburg, PA 15931 (coordinates 40°28'28.2"N 78°42'04.7"W), this 46.3-acre former coal plant retired in 2019 and has a retired capacity of 98 MW (see Figure 20 and Table 9). Most of the buildings have been demolished, and a waste management company has built a parking lot and started operating on the site. The site has been decommissioned, but the remediation status is unknown. The site is south of US-22 and just north of Bethlehem Mine 33. It is zoned for industrial use and has 55.6 acres of potentially developable adjacent land rated as moderately rugged. The site is considered a presumptive brownfield and there is no known groundwater contamination. FEMA designates the site as having a relatively low natural hazard risk and as a minimal flooding risk. The parcel and nearby parcels are located within or adjacent to a confirmed underground mining area and are, therefore, considered to have elevated mine subsidence potential. The site has immediate access to major highways, and rail access is ~1 mile away; however, the closest major river is ~10 miles away. The site has close access to transmission lines, a substation, and a natural gas pipeline, and the nearest installed broadband is ~1 mile away. The nearest generating station is ~7 miles away. The site is located on the Marcellus shale formation. The nearest wastewater treatment plant is ~1 mile away, and the nearest brownfield is ~2 miles away. There are ~389,131 people within 30 miles of the site.”
PATER Part A report, section 4.4, page 38
Site attributes
- Report name
- Cambria Cogeneration
- Address
- 243 Rubisch Rd, Ebensburg, PA 15931
- Coordinates
- 40°28'28.2"N 78°42'04.7"W
- Fuel
- Waste Coal
- Zoning
- Industrial
- Ruggedness
- 4 = Moderately rugged
- Brownfield designation
- Presumptive
- On-site contamination
- TBD
- Groundwater contamination
- None Known
- FEMA natural hazards risk
- Relatively low
- FEMA flood hazard
- Minimal
- Population within 30 miles
- About 389,131 (report estimate)
- PJM transmission zone
- PENELEC
- Evaluated for
- New large load
Distance to infrastructure
| Distance to | Miles |
|---|---|
| Major road | 0.27 |
| Rail network | 1.03 |
| Major river | 9.47 |
| Transmission line | 0.00 |
| Substation | 0.07 |
| Natural gas pipeline | 0.13 |
| Broadband | 1.25 |
| Marcellus Shale formation | 0.00 |
| Wastewater treatment facility | 1.01 |
| Brownfield site | 2.20 |
What the report evaluated this site for
The report places sites in the PENELEC transmission zone in its large-load category, because expected generation additions there exceed projected load growth (pages 76 and 79).
The acreage-based generation estimates in Table 28 cover only the sites in zones evaluated for generation, so this site does not appear there.
Where this site stands
- Current status
- Part A candidate. Part B will narrow the 21 sites to 5 to 7 priorities.
- Next step
- Part B will rank the sites and validate the top 5 to 7 through site visits (page 103).
- Public comment
- Written comments on Part A are accepted under PUC Docket No. M-2026-3059601 through October 14, 2026.
- Review meetings
- The report says PATER Study Review Meetings are planned for October and February (page 103).
All 21 candidate sites
- Barbadoes Island2.7 mi
- Venice Island (JSC)5.7 mi
- Cromby12.1 mi
- Martins Creek Harwood69.5 mi
- West Shore86.3 mi
- Jenkins86.6 mi
- Stanton92.5 mi
- Lock Haven133.6 mi
- Milesburg142.6 mi
- Williamsburg154.6 mi
- Cambria Cogeneration180.4 mi
- Armstrong Power Station225.6 mi
- Piney Creek229.0 mi
- Elrama Power Plant243.1 mi
- Hatfield's Ferry244.6 mi
- Mitchell Power Station245.8 mi
- F R Phillips260.8 mi
- Wayne264.5 mi
- AES Beaver Valley268.1 mi
- North East Cogeneration277.1 mi
- Erie Mill284.4 mi
Our view on the study
Pennsylvania is studying two Schuylkill power sites. We think residents deserve corrected data, real environmental analysis and a straight answer on costs before the list gets shorter.
Read our view →Take action
File a comment by October 14, watch the October 7 review meeting, and come to the Zoning Hearing Board on Thursday, October 15 at 7:00 p.m.
Ways to help →