Armstrong Power Station
Armstrong County · 108 Power Plant Rd, Adrian, PA 16210
A coal plant that retired in 2012 with 326.4 MW of capacity, on a 32.05-acre parcel in Armstrong County. The PATER study evaluates it for new generation or large load.
The site by the numbers
What the report says about this site
“Located at 108 Power Plant Rd, Adrian, PA 16210 (coordinates 40°55'45.0"N 79°27'58.5"W), this 32-acre former coal plant on the Allegheny River retired in 2012 and has a retired capacity of 326.4 MW (see infrastructure and is still owned by FirstEnergy via Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC. Decommissioning remains in the planning stages, and remediation is in progress. It is currently not zoned for any particular use and has ~460 acres of adjacent available land, but the terrain is rated as highly rugged. The site is treated as a presumptive brownfield, has confirmed on-site soil contamination, and TBD groundwater contamination. FEMA designates the site as having a very low natural hazard risk but sitting within the floodway. The parcel is not located within a known coal mining area and is, therefore, considered to have minimal mine subsidence potential; however, nearby parcels fall within a documented mineable coal area with potential mine subsidence risk. The site has immediate access to rail and the river, and a major highway runs within 5 miles of the site. Transmission lines and a substation are present within 1 mile, and a natural gas pipeline exists ~3 miles away. The site is located on the Marcellus shale formation. Broadband is installed ~4.5 miles away, and the nearest wastewater treatment site is just over 6 miles away. The nearest generator is ~20 miles away, and the nearest brownfield site is ~15 miles away. There are ~369,926 people living within 30 miles of the site.”
PATER Part A report, section 4.2, page 36
Site attributes
- Report name
- Armstrong Power Station
- Address
- 108 Power Plant Rd, Adrian, PA 16210
- Coordinates
- 40°55'45.0"N 79°27'58.5"W
- Fuel
- Bituminous Coal
- Zoning
- Special
- Ruggedness
- 5 = Highly rugged
- Brownfield designation
- Presumptive
- On-site contamination
- Confirmed
- Groundwater contamination
- TBD
- FEMA natural hazards risk
- Very low
- FEMA flood hazard
- Floodway
- Population within 30 miles
- About 369,926 (report estimate)
- PJM transmission zone
- APS
- Evaluated for
- New generation or large load
Distance to infrastructure
| Distance to | Miles |
|---|---|
| Major road | 4.39 |
| Rail network | 0.07 |
| Major river | 0.33 |
| Transmission line | 0.00 |
| Substation | 0.07 |
| Natural gas pipeline | 3.01 |
| Broadband | 4.51 |
| Marcellus Shale formation | 0.00 |
| Wastewater treatment facility | 6.11 |
| Brownfield site | 14.81 |
The report’s acreage-based capacity estimates
| Technology | Parcel (32 acres) | Extended (317 acres) |
|---|---|---|
| Natural gas | 160 | 1,587 |
| Conventional nuclear | 53 | 529 |
| Battery storage | 458 | 4,533 |
| Solar | 5 | 45 |
The report evaluated sites in the APS transmission zone for both new generation and new large loads, because the difference between expected load and generation there was marginal (page 79).
Where this site stands
- Current status
- Part A candidate. Part B will narrow the 21 sites to 5 to 7 priorities.
- Next step
- Part B will rank the sites and validate the top 5 to 7 through site visits (page 103).
- Public comment
- Written comments on Part A are accepted under PUC Docket No. M-2026-3059601 through October 14, 2026.
- Review meetings
- The report says PATER Study Review Meetings are planned for October and February (page 103).
All 21 candidate sites
- Barbadoes Island2.7 mi
- Venice Island (JSC)5.7 mi
- Cromby12.1 mi
- Martins Creek Harwood69.5 mi
- West Shore86.3 mi
- Jenkins86.6 mi
- Stanton92.5 mi
- Lock Haven133.6 mi
- Milesburg142.6 mi
- Williamsburg154.6 mi
- Cambria Cogeneration180.4 mi
- Armstrong Power Station225.6 mi
- Piney Creek229.0 mi
- Elrama Power Plant243.1 mi
- Hatfield's Ferry244.6 mi
- Mitchell Power Station245.8 mi
- F R Phillips260.8 mi
- Wayne264.5 mi
- AES Beaver Valley268.1 mi
- North East Cogeneration277.1 mi
- Erie Mill284.4 mi
Our view on the study
Pennsylvania is studying two Schuylkill power sites. We think residents deserve corrected data, real environmental analysis and a straight answer on costs before the list gets shorter.
Read our view →Take action
File a comment by October 14, watch the October 7 review meeting, and come to the Zoning Hearing Board on Thursday, October 15 at 7:00 p.m.
Ways to help →