PATER site tracker
Part A candidate

AES Beaver Valley

Beaver County · 400 Frankfort Rd, Monaca, PA 15061

A coal plant that retired in 2015 with 149 MW of capacity, on a 196-acre parcel in Beaver County. The PATER study evaluates it for new generation or large load.

DUQ zoneEvaluated for new generation or large loadCoalRetired 2015
At a glance

The site by the numbers

Retired capacity149 MW
Retired in2015
Parcel196 acres
Adjacent land54.94 acres
Within 30 miles1.42 million
From 900 Conshohocken Rd268.1 miles
Section 4.1

What the report says about this site

“Located at 400 Frankfort Rd, Monaca, PA 15061 (coordinates 40°40'03.0"N 80°21'12.5"W), and also known as the Beaver Valley Generation Plant, this 196-acre former coal plant on the Ohio River and Raccoon Creek retired in 2015 and has a retired capacity of 149 MW (see Figure 17 and Table 6). The facility occupied leased land within a 196-acre parcel owned by Nova Chemicals. The lease was terminated in 2015 following an early buyout of the power purchase agreement by West Penn Power, the plant’s primary customer (Utility Dive, 2015). Ownership of the parcel transferred to Styropek (i.e., BVPV Styrenics, LLC) in 2020 (The Allegheny Front, 2023). Styropek ceased operations in 2026, and county property records show that the site was acquired by Beaver County Redevelopment Co. LLC, a redevelopment entity, in April 2026. It is zoned for industrial use and has 54.9 adjacent acreage possibly open for further redevelopment space, though the terrain is rated as highly rugged. The site is treated as a presumptive brownfield with soil and groundwater contamination to be determined (TBD). FEMA designates the site as having a very low natural hazard risk with minimal flood hazard. The parcel and nearby parcels are designated as having possible mine subsidence potential, as they are located within or adjacent to a known coal mining area; however, no publicly accessible PA DEP records were identified to confirm that mining activities occurred on the site. The site has immediate access to the road network, the rail network, and a river. Transmission lines, a substation, and a natural gas pipeline are all available within 1 mile; Broadband, the closest generation plant, the Marcellus shale formation, and a wastewater treatment facility are all available within 5 miles. The nearest brownfield site is ~6 miles away. There are ~1,421,408 people within 30 miles of the site.”

PATER Part A report, section 4.1, page 35
Table 6

Site attributes

Report name
AES Beaver Valley Partners Beaver Valley
Address
400 Frankfort Rd, Monaca, PA 15061
Coordinates
40°40'03.0"N 80°21'12.5"W
Fuel
Coal
Zoning
Industrial
Ruggedness
5 = Highly rugged
Brownfield designation
Presumptive
On-site contamination
TBD
Groundwater contamination
TBD
FEMA natural hazards risk
Very low
FEMA flood hazard
Minimal
Population within 30 miles
About 1,421,408 (report estimate)
PJM transmission zone
DUQ
Evaluated for
New generation or large load
Table 6

Distance to infrastructure

Approximate distance in miles, as published in Table 6 (page 35). The report says distances are measured from a point on the site and “all distance measurements must be considered general.”
Distance toMiles
Major road0.08
Rail network0.12
Major river1.16
Transmission line0.70
Substation0.13
Natural gas pipeline0.72
Broadband1.10
Marcellus Shale formation0.00
Wastewater treatment facility2.04
Brownfield site5.89
Table 28

The report’s acreage-based capacity estimates

Installed capacity potential in megawatts, from Table 28 (pages 78 and 79). The report calls these estimates “approximate as they are based on parcel acreage (which may differ from developable land acreage) and single land use intensity values per technology.” The gas figure is the acreage divided by 0.2 acres per megawatt (Table 27). Extended acreage adds adjacent parcels with the same owner.
TechnologyParcel (196 acres)Extended (251 acres)
Natural gas9801,255
Conventional nuclear327418
Battery storage2,8003,585
Solar2836

The report evaluated sites in the DUQ transmission zone for both new generation and new large loads, because the difference between expected load and generation there was marginal (page 79).

Status

Where this site stands

Current status
Part A candidate. Part B will narrow the 21 sites to 5 to 7 priorities.
Next step
Part B will rank the sites and validate the top 5 to 7 through site visits (page 103).
Public comment
Written comments on Part A are accepted under PUC Docket No. M-2026-3059601 through October 14, 2026.
Review meetings
The report says PATER Study Review Meetings are planned for October and February (page 103).

Our view on the study

Pennsylvania is studying two Schuylkill power sites. We think residents deserve corrected data, real environmental analysis and a straight answer on costs before the list gets shorter.

Read our view →

Take action

File a comment by October 14, watch the October 7 review meeting, and come to the Zoning Hearing Board on Thursday, October 15 at 7:00 p.m.

Ways to help →